Claim: In any situation, the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments.
Reason: Facts are objective, so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals.
The issue here claims that to compel people best approach is to present them with facts and statistics in comparison to emotional arguments. The reason to validate the claim is facts are objective making more persuasive than subjective appeals. But the obvious question arrives is statistics always persuasive? To answer this question accurately there's a need of a deeper comprehension to the claim considering various instances in various sector.
First let's consider example of a situation in the corporate world. There is a sales team of a company which has to sell its product to a MNC, hence a presentation is required to persuade the managers of the other company. So in this situation adding up facts and statistics of the impact of this product would be more persuasive than emotionally persuading to buy. However it cannot include all statistics, sometimes presentations in the corporate worls also include content which involves pursuation on emotional grounds. For example, slides which shows why the buyer is important for their company. The brief idea is in situations like these factual arguments play a significant role than emotional arguments
On the other hand, consider a case of organation which collects donation to the needy. Here, to pursuade people to donate to the needy it is important to emotionally connect with them hence statistics wont be of any use here. But statistics can be used to deliver facts on emotional grounds. For instance a fact like 50% of the kids death are caused due to hunger. Facts like this will persuade people even in the case related to emotional manipulation. However here emotional arguments play a substantial role in comparison to the factual arguments.
Let's take another case of government proposing a new reform in the judiciary. Often surveys are included in the decision making process, which can be considered both statistics and emotional argument. Hence in some sense, including facts is important like in the first example. But meanwhile, emotional arguments play an equal role in certain types of persuation.
In conclusion, perhaps its important to evaluate the situation and the target before hand. The best approach which can be derived from the set of examples presented is to include both emotional and factual aspects in their pitch as both play an important role.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ive? To answer this question accurately theres a need of a deeper comprehension to the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'buying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'persuade' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: buying
... persuasive than emotionally persuading to buy. However it cannot include all statist...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ive than emotionally persuading to buy. However it cannot include all statistics, some...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly persuading to buy. However it cannot include all statistics, sometimes presen...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...ds. For instance a fact like 50% of the kids death are caused due to hunger. Facts l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...case related to emotional manipulation. However here emotional arguments play a substan...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...comparison to the factual arguments. Lets take another case of government proposi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...considered both statistics and emotional argument. Hence in some sense, including...
^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...oth statistics and emotional argument. Hence in some sense, including facts is impor...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: BEFORE_HAND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beforehand'?
Suggestion: beforehand
...o evaluate the situation and the target before hand. The best approach which can be derived...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18684210526 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85299449041 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8581932631 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8571428571 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0952380952 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370101834656 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105797906099 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100944783983 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200082287844 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112800116641 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.