Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals Write a response in whic

Essay topics:

Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.

Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Society is a dynamic entity, that it cannot remain static. So, basically the nature of society changes with change in behaviour, attitude and character of the people residing. The prompt suggests that to understand the nature of the society, one has to examine the character of the role model that the society has chosen. I mostly agree, with the prompt for the following reasons.

Firstly, the society choose the individual that are scintellating, judicious and decorated as their representative; mostly for the reason that, they are better at delivaring, convincing and producing a un waver and unbiased decision. For an instance in the local election people elect the individual that has aformentioned traits of the leader. And, there is sense of pride as well when such individual are elected as the representative. On contrary if there was a notorious person, who has turpid attitude and is filled with rife behavoiur then nobody would want such a representative to represent their society.

Secondly, the history of the society also depicts the society in the holistic view. For an instance the Gorkha tribe of Nepal, who has fought countless battels and showed their firece bravery to the world represents the whole country. Similarly, the figures like; Bhimsen Thapa, Ansuvarma, Prithvi Narayan Shah are the epitome of the nation that represents the shrewdenss, bravery and tenacity respectively.
On contrary there were also many rana rulers that had worked for the best of the country, but since theyhave been established as the crule traynne in history the better halfves are also neglected by the people in Nepal.

Lastly, some might argye that the society is dynamic entity its core element that people are creduluous and capricious. So sticking to the fact that the specific individual represent the whole society is vague. As, that individual may represent the majority portion but not the all. For an instance the our democratic system of election the Prime Minister and President are selected by the political party that has won majority of seats in the upper and the lower house. Despite the fact that pople might want some other individual to represent themselves.

In conclusion, some might argue that the role models and the heros are representative of the socety, but they should know that the establishment of the society is bases on the principles of the heros that existed in past.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...at delivaring, convincing and producing a un waver and unbiased decision. For an ...
^
Line 8, column 300, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...ortion but not the all. For an instance the our democratic system of election the Prime...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 214, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...he principles of the heros that existed in past.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, as to, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1421319797 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7503276341 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8820406672 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216970219949 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692394087524 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922355443387 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114556004534 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915378082727 0.0667264976115 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.