The argument is about governments must ensure that major cities receive the financial support in order to thrive because cultural traditions of the country are primarily reserved at those cities. I fundamentally agree with that claim and want to present some of the supporting facts to strengthen this claim.
First of all, big cities are the major spots of the country which are famous nationally and internationally. So that, there is the chances of influx of higher number of people for the touristic attraction. Due to the large number of people residing in the city everyday demand of the people in common sectors such as transportation, water, electricity and food is obviously higher. In order to meet the demand of the people government has to work in the similar manner. Other basic needs such as safety, means of entertainment, provision of recreational sports seems necessary. To make the working environment safer, efficient, it is needed to maintain the all the infrastructure in the sound condition. Bigger cities like New York, Paris and London they are the touristic attraction as well. In some of the country tourism is one of the major industry for the economy of that country. To maintain the standard of the tourism government has to work accordingly.
Secondly, major cities are hob for the economic activities and industrial areas as well. So many people will be in the city area to follow their dream. People for the job and education goes in the cities because the availability of opportunity is higher in the city area. To maintain the quality of life and standard of the city from all the aspects it seems respective city needs the adequate amount of funding.
Some people argue that not only the city but other part of the country should be equally treated while distributing the national fund for the development. I would like to say that other parts of country such as rural areas and villages should be to in the priority according to their necessity. If the population in the certain village is very low then the degree of requirement for the healthcare or school is obviously low at those areas; i mean number of infrastructure needed is low.
In summary, bigger cities need bigger budget to thrive and city itself might not be capable for that. In order to meet the requirement of the people living in the city and for the touristic purpose and to save the antique property which is preserved in the city, government have to provide more subsidies to the major cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ree with that claim and want to present some of the supporting facts to strengthen this cla...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities are the major spots of the country which are famous nationally and internat...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are the chances'?
Suggestion: there are the chances
...ationally and internationally. So that, there is the chances of influx of higher number of people fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...re the touristic attraction as well. In some of the country tourism is one of the major ind...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 442, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...school is obviously low at those areas; i mean number of infrastructure needed is...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as to, i mean, in summary, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88758782201 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76071788094 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8222780805 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.35 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341988948384 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098099517281 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093531036859 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20655640132 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112937052167 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.