Throughout the world, national financial assistance programs have never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although many people believe that governments have to provide their major cities the amount of money they need so that they could develop well, the issue as to whether those cities are the places where the nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated or not remains controversial. As far as I’m concerned, it is true that authorities must allocate adequate budget to their major cities to grow but we should carefully consider the point of view that nation’s cultural traditions are preserved and generated in cities.
First, major cities normally have a huge number of citizens, which leads to increasing demands for jobs, food and beverage, shopping and leisure. Therefore, corporates, high-end restaurants, shopping malls and entertainment centers are concentrated in metropolises. Suppose, for example, San Francisco is home to all sorts of corporate giants like Facebook and Apple. As a result, those cities usually contribute significantly to the national economy, especially in terms of the production and consumption of goods and services. If the government guarantees financial support, those cities could keep the current rate of growth and development and attract more people and companies.
Second, when it comes to major cities, one must notice a remarkable attribute of those places is diversity due to their numerous population. This might lead to the considerable differences in culture. To illustrate, when visiting New York or San Francisco, people could see many groups of citizens such as White, Black, Asian or Hispanic united or divided by ethnicity or religion. These are where they might hear hundreds of different languages, walking on the street. Moreover, each group has its own traditions, lifestyles and taste of foods. For instance, Vietnamese Americans in Little Saigon usually celebrate Lunar New Year besides Christian New Year. There is no doubt that the nation’s cultural traditions are difficult to be preserved and generated in major cities.
Finally, contrary to major cities, small towns and villages tend towards homogeneity, and their residents are little exposure to racial or ethnic diversity. As a result, individuals in those remote areas primarily keep traditions from previous generations and normally take part in traditional festivals. Additionally, cultural practices are more pristine in rural areas. For example, in Pennsylvania, citizens celebrate GroundHog day every year to predict the end of the winter. These unique celebrations might be a notable element to attract tourists from other regions, especially from urban communities. This might positively affect income and boost economic growth of those areas. Authorities and legislators should consider this aspect to help people in the countryside continue to preserve and generate nation’s cultural traditions.
In conclusion, taking all the above mentioned reasons, it is plausible that governments have to guarantee the financial support for their major cities since they need funds for growth and development but not for cultural tradition purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...that they could develop well, the issue as to whether those cities are the places where the n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2747.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67561983471 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96178316522 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566115702479 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 857.7 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8303614373 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.434782609 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0434782609 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13043478261 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302868530702 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726597771466 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862746971299 0.0758088955206 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18260835921 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951550113253 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.