Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
We are living in the contemporaries where science and technological advancement occurs every new day. New technologies are invented using thinking power of homo sepiens where they are experiencing new things and analysing the problems they are facing and finds their ways to diminish its sway by inventing its alternatives. Here the author juxtaposes two predominant things of humans 'Imagination' and 'experience'. Both are most important to invent new technologies which deteriorates the human problems and makes work more smooth. Without imagination one can not think of any think which is out of the box, also without experience imagination can't applied physically. So, between two most lavish things of homo sepiens, I generally prefer Imagination has required compared to experience.
With imagination one can do everything and can think beyond the abilities like in computer science, the student or scientist can think about the complex problems of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms in simple and easier way. Likewise any ordinary people also can imagine about certain limitations of any gadget or any human things who may apply those imaginary ideas to develop new technology. This way one who is not able to apply imaginative ideas can share to other people who has lack of imagination power.
Big tech companies and other business organizations have also the type of employees called system analyst who takes survey of the people and analysis of the things which makes stymie to ordinary people. These employees analyse problems and works on it by imagine new ideas to reduce humans' problems. One can easily apply their thoughts into experience once they clear what to do and how the process will happen.
Also those people who doesn't have any prior knowledge can work as system analyst as I said before on any company by their innovative ideas and their great imaginative power. So I totally agree with author's view about imagination is more powerfull rather then experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 642, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ox, also without experience imagination cant applied physically. So, between two mos...
^^^^
Line 1, column 763, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "required compared" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'comparing' or 'to be compared'.
Suggestion: comparing; to be compared
...nerally prefer Imagination has required compared to experience. With imagination one ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ng algorithms in simple and easier way. Likewise any ordinary people also can imagine ab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... do and how the process will happen. Also those people who doesnt have any prior ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s will happen. Also those people who doesnt have any prior knowledge can work as sy...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...ut imagination is more powerfull rather then experience.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, may, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27414330218 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80853518351 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548286604361 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3601921737 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.928571429 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192749354575 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076440587281 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063723373194 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124432304125 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123453942662 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.