It is not absolutely true that people who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes whereas the claim that imagination is a more valuable asset than experience is correct, though under the untenable casual relationship.
People cannot be free to imagine contingencies without some related knowledge in that field of study. The relevant information is beneficial for people to delineate their hypothesis. Galileo overrided the conventianal physics principles proposed by Aristotle by making a myriad of experiments and observations. After knowing that the gravitation force is the necessary for attaining speed and force is the decisive factor which provides a speed instead of perpetuates a speed, Galileo drew a conclusion that force is the fundamental element to supply acceleration which is also dubbed the acceleration principle. Plus, Madam Curie also discovered Radium and refined it in her laboratory through a large amount of experiments and trials. She cannot obtain this achievements without acknowledge the characteristics about Radium. Hence, only people realize the relevant information about a realm, he or she can imagine the result.
On the other hand, imagination certainly is more valuable than experience. People have imagination could invent considerable discoveries. Columbus coincidentally discovered a new continent on the basis of nothing he know about that area. He just wanted to travel to West India but unpurposely found the new land. Van Goph had learn the skills with colors and lights which against to the academism. Nevertheless, he could not be contented with these elements. He was bold and invented transformative post-impressionism at that time, which is repleted with significant of personal feelings and emotions. His experimental step was successully faciliate the development of the art. Thus, it is no doubt that imagination is more valuable than experience.
On the ground of the reason, the claim is tenuous. It is correct that people need numerous of knowledge to imagine some probabilies and decribe their theories, so the reason is not objectively substantiated. And the claim is valid because imagination is really invaluable than experience, which could supply impetus to accelerate the development. Also Ford discovered a new technology about assembly-line to manufacture the cars, which affords new method to produce products in many companies nowadays. Plus the examples mentioned above about the Columbus and Van Goph, the claim has no relation with the reason. Consequently, the casul relationship is unconvincing because the valid claim bases on an defeasible reason.
In sum, the casual relationship is tenuous because the validated claim is based on a tenuous reason which has no relevance with the claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...periments and trials. She cannot obtain this achievements without acknowledge the ch...
^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce. People have imagination could invent considerable discoveries. Columbus coinc...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
...ew continent on the basis of nothing he know about that area. He just wanted to trav...
^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...posely found the new land. Van Goph had learn the skills with colors and lights which...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...posely found the new land. Van Goph had learn the skills with colors and lights which...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... impetus to accelerate the development. Also Ford discovered a new technology about ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 700, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...incing because the valid claim bases on an defeasible reason. In sum, the casu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, incidentally, nevertheless, really, so, thus, whereas, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5599078341 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21658738595 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539170506912 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.5426117057 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.541666667 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386666164278 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997871826042 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140254339605 0.0758088955206 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235522429438 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20082633348 0.0667264976115 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.