When it comes to accomplishing a task or a goal, it is hard to judge whether imagination or experience is more important. Imagination adds creativity and innvoations to the work; while experience helps smoothing and completing the process. If you wish to perform certain job, sort of neccessary skill sets must be equipped in order to make the things done.
Every creations of insightful inventions are driven by imagination. Take the inventor of the first aircraft in the world as example, as he was dare to dream of flying like a bird, so he started making and testing different flying machines. Humans had no previous experiences in flying. Only due to the brave imaginations of the inventor, airplanes could eventually produced. As imagination is not bounded by established habits and attitudes, we can make use of it to create innovative ideas.
Imagination brainstorms our old perception and brings new design to our work, however, it can not work solely on its own. The idea of building aircraft is made by imagination, but the actual product is made by comphrehensive knowledge in mechanics and electronics. Without strong background in technical theories, he couldn't manufacture aircrafts so successfully.
Indeed experience is always the foundation of imagination. Einstein published the law of relativity because he studied the old sound physics rules thoroughly and doubted about them. Film directors make great movies because they deeply understand the operations of a filming studio and how to coordinate between team members. Experience usually point out a clear direction of how to get things done for us to follow. Without past experience in certain aspects, tasks are difficult to even get started.
To conclude, imagination is always built on existing experience. Imagination is important and brings great impact when we are working on creating new things, but experience is essential to make it done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to smooth' or 'smooth'.
Suggestion: to smooth; smooth
...ons to the work; while experience helps smoothing and completing the process. If you wish...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dared', 'durst'.
Suggestion: dared; durst
...raft in the world as example, as he was dare to dream of flying like a bird, so he s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'produce'
Suggestion: produce
...he inventor, airplanes could eventually produced. As imagination is not bounded by estab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ng background in technical theories, he couldnt manufacture aircrafts so successfully. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...nufacture aircrafts so successfully. Indeed experience is always the foundation of ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...t things done for us to follow. Without past experience in certain aspects, tasks are difficult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29641693811 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09495624383 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625407166124 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6925917534 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189283093176 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594855300741 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487059693896 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104631496425 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415029418305 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.