Having an unlimited imagination is one of the characteristics of being human. We have the imagination to create fictional worlds for stories and the imagination to solve problems with out of the box solutions. In any given field, some may say that imagination is more valuable than experience, because those who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible. I disagree with this claim because imagination does not give you the knowledge to succeed within a field, experience does.
Experience within a certain field gives us certain habits and attitudes. While some may say these characteristics act as constraints, I believe they are the tools to succeed within a field. A person lacking experience may not succeed relying on imagination alone. A scientist will have gained collaborational and organizational habits through experience. This will make this scientist more likely to create a contribution than a newer scientist who is imagining what they may accomplish. An experienced author will have more best sellers than the novice because they know how to publicize and sell themselves.
One popular example of this is Bill Gates, and how he dropped out of school to create Microsoft. While this may be motivational to others, people tend to forget that he dropped out of Harvard business school. He gained the experience, habits, and attitudes needed to create his own business through Harvard. If he never went to Harvard, and just worked with his imagination, it is unlikely that his business would have went as far as it did.
Within any field, imagination is important key for creation and problem solving, but should not be relied on alone. While working in a field, it is the experience gained through problem solving that will make a person successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...s and the imagination to solve problems with out of the box solutions. In any given fiel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...contribution than a newer scientist who is imagining what they may accomplish. An experience...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'best' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: best
...mplish. An experienced author will have more best sellers than the novice because they kn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the best'.
Suggestion: more the best
...mplish. An experienced author will have more best sellers than the novice because they kn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...s unlikely that his business would have went as far as it did. Within any field,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13402061856 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96650964893 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9883632247 60.3974514979 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.375 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4375 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261912222782 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905601222027 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979753121162 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156172432145 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124579460111 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.