The statement claims that in today’s society, it’s impossible to have a living hero, since the media will finally ruin their reputation. I partly agree with that. It is true that media sometimes reveals the hero’s negative news and eventually destroys their reputations, but it doesn’t result in the consequence that there will not be a hero in today’s society.
Nobody is perfect. Thus, if a living hero in today’s society, such as a celebrity, does not behave carefully and do things that are not expected by the public, with media’s extensive exposure, his or her reputation will finally, undoubtedly be ruined. For example, Sun Yang, a world-class swimming champion, was once regarded as a national hero of China for his excellent swimming performance. However, the incident of his violent violation of doping control was reported by hundreds of media, and he did not even show regrets for the whole thing. Thus his reputation was completely ruined by his improper behavior and arrogant attitude. Bill Clinton used to be a political hero respected by the United States, whereas, due to his affair, which is generally morally unacceptable to the public, was widely reported by the media, his political image was basically destroyed.
What’s more, the media can also create heroes by reporting positive news about inspiring events done by individuals. So to some extent, media even create more heroes than humans ever before. At present, the whole world is suffering from the epidemic of coronavirus, thousands of doctors and nurses risk their lives, fighting against the disease as heroes. Fortunately, thanks to the broadcast of the media, we can easily learn that there are many touching stories and there are many heroes worth us to admire. In the past, we can hardly learn stories of heroical individuals, since the speed of information transmission was very slow before the invention of media. Therefore, in fact, the media even make more living heroes than destroying them.
However, even though some heroes made some mistakes and be reported by the media, we still cannot deny their achievements in their specific fields, which originally made them a hero. Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, was criticized by media that while he claimed himself as an environmentalist, his company, SpaceX, has launched countless rockets into space, which absolutely burnt countless fossil fuels along the way. But we cannot deny that SpaceX can stimulate the progress of human civilization, which eventually made him a hero. Mark Zuckerburg, founder of Facebook, was criticized for expelling the co-founder of Facebook. The media described him as a ruthless man. Nevertheless, his brilliant creation, Facebook, has benefited millions of people, and that was enough to make him still regarded as a hero.
Therefore, from my point of view, it is still possible for today’s society to regard a living person as a hero, regardless of the media’s gigantic exposure. People who made a great contribution in their specific field will still be respected as heroes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... even show regrets for the whole thing. Thus his reputation was completely ruined by...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2585.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23279352227 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81377464828 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54048582996 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2135621332 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.391304348 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4782608696 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73913043478 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226205598773 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673695351469 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410288613799 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136419591342 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312238756078 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.