Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
As the fact that heroes regarded by media outlets enjoy famous during their lifetime but diminish soon shortly after their deaths does exists, but that by no means indicate that every hero on the media has a consequence like that. Thus, I basically disagree the deduction of the asserted claim, I believe living man should be praised to be heroes for their model effects. As for the reason mentioned, it mainly results from the way of selection of heroes and the quality of selected ones.
Admittedly, heroes initially regarded by masses as kind, ingenious and sage, are criticized as well by them for their disingenuous purpose of their acceptance of media scrutiny, causing their reputation to diminish and deteriorate fast. One reason possible is about the way of such media programs. It is inappropriate, at least in the view of masses, for a veteran and honorific soldier to be invited to a series containing too much frivolous factors. Psychological mechanism underlying that is people's expectation affected by their stereotype of soldier that is rigorous and strict more or less has some effects on their judgment regarding such invitation. And, another possible inextricable implication of such invitation is about the veteran soldier's lucrative need, which could be satisfied through attending some shows. Accordingly, sometimes the media's way of making heroes popular is the cause of the diminishment of heroes' cachet.
However, we could not blame media's fault on the action of selecting heroes, or more precisely, the action of finding heroes. The previous media's method is like packaging a star and try to get more exposure on those "man-made heroes". But if we figure out the paramount point of heroes, they might have actually set up fantastic examples for masses.
Heroes, most of times are presented as individuals, like Cristiano Ronaldo, one of the greatest football player in the world, frequently changes a football game characterized by collectivism by himself alone. In Portugal, a joke is that there are no laws there but one, never insult Cristiano. Clearly, whatever from the perspective of media or individual, he is putatively regarded as civil hero. Although his techniques and understandings of football do not teach their fans, people learn a lot from his fearless and ambitious spirits, which are the true meaning of heroes. Moreover, role-models also show up in collective forms, especially in socialism country as China. But the name changes into " spirits of something ", iterating directly the inherent nature of heroes. In fact, heroes could be divided into different categories, not only confined within soldiers--real person--but also within visual reality, which could be translated to be the power of ideology, a kind of soft power. USA is the most successive country to influence the world with soft power as Hollywood films, American Dream, and so forth. The captain of America, a protagonist in Marvel film industry, well represents the ideal hero image of Americans, encouraging youngsters to fight like him. Accordingly, role-models and heroes could be in disparate forms but the similarity is their ability of encouraging people and being their spiritual tenet.
In sum, I acknowledge scrutinizing heroes inappropriately by media ultimately leads to diminishment of heroes' reputation, but the error of media should not be ascribed to the finding of heroes. People with substantial contribution have qualification to be selected, but the extent of the contribution depends on environments. Just like the form, the standards of selection of heroes are quite different, even the most ordinary people are pillars of their little families. Therefore, canceling regarding heroes is acceptable unless underlying rationale is misunderstood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the deduction of the asserted claim, I believe living man should be praised to ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oes and the quality of selected ones. Admittedly, heroes initially regarded by...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the diminishment of heroes cachet. However, we could not blame medias fault...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...set up fantastic examples for masses. Heroes, most of times are presented as i...
^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
...astic examples for masses. Heroes, most of times are presented as individuals, like Cris...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople and being their spiritual tenet. In sum, I acknowledge scrutinizing heroe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, at least, in fact, kind of, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3218.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 597.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39028475712 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03055490359 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 326.0 215.323595506 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546063651591 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 1011.6 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1169082959 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9615384615 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239072595016 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656966883074 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05614978998 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145589721708 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653046673928 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 184.0 100.480337079 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.