That law plays a significant role in every human society is an undeniable fact. Should officials realize the advantages of the law in the prosperity of the society they will ponder over legislation and execution of the law much more scrupulously. Law is an integrity part of the every human society if people wants to live together in a community they have to legislate and enact laws. The effects of the law on people intention and changing their hearts and minds has recently been the topic of debate among experts.
I do believe that law can solve many problems of the modern societies and these are my justifications. To begin with imagining a country without law, we can see what would happen if there is not law. From ancient times human try to live in groups and in a larger form, society, they try to set some rules and governing systems to govern over the people which means to control them and force them to follow the rules and laws. And from that time humanity starts to grow and make larger communities, cities, and country, and these laws make it possible to live together and help each other to reach achievements which were not possible to achieve singular. Therefore, by looking back to the history, we can see the effect and helpfulness of the law.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that every law has a logical reason behind it if official aware the people about these logics, people changes their mind, accept the law and obey. If experts train the children to obey the law by apprising them about the reason and logic behind the laws, then we have people which obey the rules not because of the fear of the punishment but because they believe that it by their heart and mind. Therefore, execution of the laws helps to train and change the people mind.
Finally, having law is important but executing and supervising this execution is more important because if you do not execute law it is like do not having a law. Hence, besides laws and legislation, we must make systems to execute and govern people and itself.
Having discussed the issue from that point of view I would rather look at it from another perspective as well. The laws without logical reasons cannot last for a long time, and cannot change the people mind. Thus, laws must be logical and fulfill the people interests. Moreover, training people and convincing them to obey the rules has much less expensive for government and society and it is not possible to superintend the people during every moment of the day. Consequently, a law cannot solve every single but many of the problems of a human community.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into consideration, the following conclusion can be drawn about the issue. Underestimating the advantages of the law in prosperity and progression of a human society in not logical. Attending to this issue meticulously contributes to teaching people the logics and reasons behind every law, and can improve several aspects of the humanity.
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 60
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 83
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 90
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 50
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reas 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2492.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76481835564 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60576571332 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44741873805 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3320256227 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.272727273 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7727272727 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296143820346 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102203621854 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548139649001 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160491189252 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401108283675 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.