History has been documented for thousands of years and will remain to be recorded. It is quotidian that school systems implant the knowledge of humanities past through courses in history. Here, the author states that learning the historical past requires a creative approach in order to understand how history unfolded. This claim assumes that the author of the historical context is unbiased and impartial towards that specific issue.
To continue with the last paragraph, there are a myriad of topics that have a variety of views in relation to a point in history, however, some topics tend to be interpreted the same. For example, most people will tend to agree that world war 2 was a result of Germany’s pernicious actions towards eradicating the Jewish population. A tyro to understanding this historical war may question why Hitler arose the prejudices in his followers. Furthermore, the reader may dig deeper into WW2’s research and discover a more profound motive to trigger the war, such as Germany’s invasion of Poland. Creativity and the desire to understand these motives will encourage the student to further research the motive and actions that lead to a specific event.
To further add to the authors reason historical information is never precisely accurate, there may be bias that can alter the way future generations interpret the data. For example, the reader may be swayed by the wording the historian used. A prime example to this is the media’s input to specific events in political debates. They may have quoted a prominent figure, however, only recorded the positive words the candidate stated in order to gain approval. The author believes that the reader should search for the true reasons through objective data not information made by a subjective voice. The learner’s understanding of historical events must involve the creativity and desire to find facts and evidence to gain better insight on the event.
From the last example, it can be apparent that the author of the records of historical events might have different notions and wording that can create partialities to the reader. In relation with the authors claim, creativity drives the researcher to find a more profound answer, with the necessity of scrutinizing facts and evidence behind that event.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...ue with the last paragraph, there are a myriad of topics that have a variety of views ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20967741935 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77032530179 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7385633577 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152465500547 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488228243716 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540259464829 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991071856164 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476012500678 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.