Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Contradictive views are important as they help humankind in achieving clarity in terms of concepts and fuels learning by pushing boundaries rather than inhibiting it. The reason for the claim is quite apt in pointing out that disagreement causes stress, but stressful circumstances are conducive to evolution and development.
Left and right-wing hold quite contradictory views, but both of them fuel each other by disagreement, by propelling each other for taking more pains to prove their stance is correct which has beneficial is for neutrals as well as academics in analyzing the situation. Hence, when we do more the concision for that particular idea increases which further fuels learning rather than inhibiting it.
Suppose two reverent scientists hold contradictory views on the composition and properties of a new chemical element. Both of them will be although distressed by such contradiction, it would also instill them with the willpower to learn more about the chemical element. The consequence of such a contradictory position is bound to allow us to learn more about the elements than we have by holding similar views. Hence, mankind has always learned more through contradictory views rather than sharing similar views.
Wright Brothers, known for their invention of the airplane, certainly held iconoclastic views on what mankind can achieve. Were they not ridiculed for their idea? Yet, they were able to revolutionize travel and transport to an insurmountable extent. Consequently, the contradictory views between society and Wright bothers sprouted extraordinary knowledge, thus thrusting the learning process rather than inhibiting it.
In some cases where the nature of people holding contradictory views is inimical, it can inhibit learning and the disagreement may not be limited to the benign consequence of stress. But, in a majority of cases, contradictory views have fueled learning. Perhaps, a more generalized way of fueling learning is through contradictory views.
Hence, to conclude although disagreement can cause stress it favors learning hence, we usually learn more from those whose views contradict us.
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish 50
- The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 16
- The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 75
- Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for the past several decades food processing companies have also been adding salicylates to foods as pr 55
- A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college aged children Therefore Seatown should institute a free tuition policy for its professo 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
...ct which has beneficial is for neutrals as well as academics in analyzing the situation. H...
Line 11, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...e from those whose views contradict us.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, may, so, still, thus, well, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58536585366 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09793904933 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557926829268 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.722667903 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386481056341 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125233063024 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123421545497 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222361447807 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146640489836 0.0667264976115 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.