In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
The need for novelty can never surpass experience. Many people in charge are at the position of power due to their aplomb. Though it is true with age we humans tend to lose our savvy, but that doesn't imply that people in power should step down after five years.
If, Steve Jobs, perhaps the best CEO of apple, would have stepped down after five years of his power, Would Apple be such a big tech company? He was responsible for making Apple the most profitable company in 2012. His ability to understand the need of customers, in my opinion, made apple the way we see it today, as an epitome of sophistication and hard work. Apple even replaced him with John Sculley, a marketing expert. however, the decline in share value shows us exactly, the value that steve jobs added to Apple. Hence, people in power should not be required to step-down if their results are revealing the contrary.
Abraham Lincoln, one of the best leaders and politicians of the US target the same agenda. America was in a big quandary after his death about who would replace him. The leader will age and would have to eventually leave there position to a successor, but doing it after a span of five years is a reckless notion. The premise which can be attacked here is what if the person in charge is not performing well, then it may be partially correct to change in five years, but even then generalizing the notion based on a small number of cases is not viable. Hence, the contrary notion of people in power not being required to step down gains more weightage.
Maxwell's contribution to magnetism and electric is unparalleled as we see it today, notwithstanding the fact that his theory was found wanting until it was coupled with the idea of Lorentz force. Hence, people can be wrongly adjudicated in a short period of time, everybody including the seemingly incompetent leaders, researchers, politicians, etc. must be at least given a good though before any notion regarding their stepping down is debated.
In conclusion, while the argument may be correct in specific cases, it cannot be considered ubiquitously true and general for all the cases. Therefore, people in power should not be required to step down after five years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...humans tend to lose our savvy, but that doesnt imply that people in power should step ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... with John Sculley, a marketing expert. however, the decline in share value shows us ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...n then generalizing the notion based on a small number of cases is not viable. Hence, the contrar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e can be wrongly adjudicated in a short period of time, everybody including the seemingly inco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...required to step down after five years.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, while, at least, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76424870466 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56992337653 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551813471503 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1825593394 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7894736842 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30250147582 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979274945499 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119935532277 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180989866621 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058663907023 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.