Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.

Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Although there are several reasonable points to support these conclusions, I tend to disagree with the author.

Firstly, since different points of view can offer wealth perspectives towards specific issues, then it is much objective than by analyzing the events from the only one side. For instance, when considering about putting out a new policy in education, the governments would collect suggestions from not only the citizens form developed districts, but also from those in remote areas, in order to maintain the equalitarian of the policy. For it is likely that some parents from undeveloped areas will be concern about the education inclination of resources, then they would not agree with the policy until several details in the policy could be improved. Next, the government would take these conflict views into account to polish the final policy. Therefore, the opposite views benefit the decision-making in a more evenhanded aspect.

Secondly, by discussing the issue with those people whose views contradict our own, we could deepen our realization of the element of the issue as well as strengthen our skills in logical thinking. Think about the debating competition. The participants in two teams hold opposite views instead of sharing a same view so that they could show their capabilities in analyzing the ins and cons of the issue and finally convincing their competitors and audience. To convince their competitors, they are should stand in other people’s shoes at first, to learn about their framework, then find out the logical weak points. Consequently, we will further strengthen our ability in logical thinking when construing our opinions towards to people who are against us.

Lastly, there is a great possibility that the disagreement could be mitigated by further researches and more communication, therefore, the stress of persuading others would be released, while the process of learning would soon be truly lucid. That is to say, if we have deeper conversation with those who have different points of views with us, then we can know about the other perspective in thinking, which might resolve several problems in the way we consider about the issue, and even alter the methods we used into a better one. Moreover, the stress we gain from the disagreement mainly comes from the assumption that we are supposed to champion our views to defeat the opposite side . However, if we forgo this assumption, just thinking about how to work out the problem we face, then in this case, we would realize it is unnecessary to figure out who is the winner, and the most vital part is to the efficient method of solving the issue. Thus, it is likely that, by melding the advantages in two opinions which are seemed to be conflict, we would provide the most practical remedy to the issue.

To sum up, without ruling out these circumstances, the conclusions are unwarranted with flaws.

Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 834, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ion-making in a more evenhanded aspect. Secondly, by discussing the issue with t...
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...on our views to defeat the opposite side . However, if we forgo this assumption, j...
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... efficient method of solving the issue. Thus it is likely that, by melding the advan...
Line 7, column 1023, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...he advantages in two opinions which are seem to be conflict, we would provide the mo...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78159188635 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.286578844 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.294117647 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5294117647 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1176470588 5.21951772744 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351676880448 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103260811616 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082560530293 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170709561712 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101098161727 0.0667264976115 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.