Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The arguer claims that all faculty in the colleges and universities are supposed to spend time working outside the academic world in professions related to the courses they teach. Considering various consequences of this policy, I tend to agree with this view.
Firstly, there is a possibility that the faculty who take part in doing professional projects with companies relevant to their fields will catch the latest trend, which promotes their performance in teaching. For instance, the marketing professors working in the think tank of FMCG companies have a great access to the current business cases, therefore, the students can learn about how the knowledge can be turned to marketing strategy in real business world. Moreover, those cases also provide plentiful working requirements details in particular working fields, so the students can explore their interests in this area and make proper career plans with the suggestions of their professors.
Secondly, it might happen that the faculty can obtain more salary that improves better financial support to their life and researches. There is no doubt that employee working outside the academic fields as a faculty from colleges or universities can have higher income than normal employees in the same department, since they are so professional that can quickly handle with tasks without much training. However, in some countries, especially in the developing countries, the basic average salary of faculty in colleges or universities are much lower than public expectation. In this case, some teachers choose to cooperate with firms for extra incomes to support their families. In addition, working beyond the academic world in their relevant professions offers more opportunities in networking with no only the authority of the companies, but also the scholars in fields, which may give a hand in their future researches, such as data for analysis and participants for experiments.
However, there are several adverse consequences we cannot ignore. On one hand, if the faculty choose to work outside their academic world, their time for teaching and researching may decline dramatically, then they will have less time communicating with their students, which shrewd their learning experience. On the other hand, since not every faculty is suitable for working as an employee in firms due to their tarctue taciturn personality, they will feel not at ease even perform worse in their workplace rather than do research and teach students in colleges or universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ce, the marketing professors working in the think tank of FMCG companies have a great acc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great access'.
Suggestion: great access
...n the think tank of FMCG companies have a great access to the current business cases, therefor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the suggestions of their professors. Secondly, it might happen that the facul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, in particular, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41012658228 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8226201916 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549367088608 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8442959687 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.384615385 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3846153846 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 5.21951772744 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240620991349 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950333095216 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106248271162 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180906671559 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874646116706 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.