Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The arguer claims that all the faculty in colleges and universities are supposed to spend time working beyond the academic fields in professions relevent to the courses they teach. I tend to agree with this argument.
Firstly, one of the consequences of implementing this policy is that, working outside the academic world can bring the latest trends in the professions related to the lessons, which benefits the students to learn about the application of knowledge in real workplace. For instance, the teachers from economic and managent schools can provide the newest business cases to their students if they are working as one of the think tank in several companies, then the students are more likely to learn about how the business run with doing consumer researches, designing new products, making advertsing campagins, and setting vital strategies, so that they can understand the courses deeply. In addition, the experience shared by the faculty offer the students a brief introduction in certain fields, which helps them to find out their dream job and make career plans.
Secondly, when it comes to the faculty, it also contributes to the researches they are working on. The staff in colleges and unis have their own researches, thus they need to glean resources in certain areas to support their academic reseaches. If a professor in marketing work as a business partner in FMCG industry, then he can do researches with the help of the companies by sending questionnaires to a large amount of consumers and collect more convincing data, since most consumer data from various areas have already been collected and well-analyized by the researching departments of the companies.
However, the flaw we cannot ignore is that it might leave less time for the faculty to communicate with their students in the class, which are more likely to cause bring worse outcomes with lower efficiency. Teaching students in the class plays a significant role in the campus life of the faculty, thus it may have some adverse effect on the performance in teaching evaluation in. Moreover, not every staff in the colleges and unis are suitable for working in firms, especially in those compaines which belong to competitive fields, such as Internet compaines.
To sum up, although there are several trivial disadvantages in the policy, I think it would be better to be implemented instead of being confined.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... students if they are working as one of the think tank in several companies, then the stu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14795918367 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81463920913 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.152937015 60.3974514979 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.166666667 118.986275619 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.21951772744 249% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209669727802 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803097461199 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983289632642 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12367830725 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107500003332 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.