Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
Opposing ideas and contradiction is the key for the individual to excel in any field: as the opposing ideas helps the other party to rectify their errors. The prompt suggests that learning is better with the people with whom our views reconcile. I mostly agree with the given statement for the following reasons.
People with contradictory views have different way of learning, understanding and interpreting things. For an instance, when the apple fell in the head of Sir Issac Newton he did not see it as the object falling on the ground: rather, he saw it as the invisible force that is pulling apple to the ground and the same force that is preventing the earth from collpsing in the sun. On the other hand, had there been no different way of looking at things we would not be able to explore the mystries of universe and still live a prosaic life. For innovation to occur and people to find some ground breaking we have to surpass the oxthodox views. And, become a iconoclast sometimes.
The contradictory ideas are developed when people are find it necessary if the existing visions do not exceed the expectations. The contradictory ideas are developed by correcting the fallicies that had previously existed, making the new ideas infalliable. For an instance, previously people thought earth was flat and had belived it to be so; however the theories form ancient Greek and many more later in line provided the evidence that earth was actually round. So, the wrong in the belief that we had acknowledge at first was corrected then and at present the new scientific equipments have helped providing concerte evidence.
Some might argue that, we can learn from the people with whome our views reconcile. As they have been through the tides that we have been through. The have better understanding of our situation and know when we need the push to excel. For an instance, if a student is suffering from the dyslexia then it would be better to hire a teacher, who understands the problem better and can help the student to excel. However, the only orthodox concept of teaching such students may not work as individual student may need different way of guidance.
In conclusion, some might argue that sharing similar ideas will help people to learn better, but they should also acknoledge the findings of people with the contradictory views. As they have the innovative and better way of learning, understanding and interpreting the stuffs than that of the orthodox ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 655, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...surpass the oxthodox views. And, become a iconoclast sometimes. The contradict...
^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...So, the wrong in the belief that we had acknowledge at first was corrected then and at pres...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...So, the wrong in the belief that we had acknowledge at first was corrected then and at pres...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to provide' or 'provide'.
Suggestion: to provide; provide
...e new scientific equipments have helped providing concerte evidence. Some might arg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... people with whome our views reconcile. As they have been through the tides that w...
^^
Line 8, column 86, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...similar ideas will help people to learn better, but they should also acknoledge the fi...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stuffs than that of the orthodox ones.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90760869565 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72528744083 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502717391304 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0787558992 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191714814947 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653482858983 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067243187702 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11257833261 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526935319652 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.