Academic courses are planned by educators to design effective courses that would lead to greater academic success. However, most times the goal seems to be to just meet UGC(University Grants Commission) guidelines and start courses that could justify funding to the university. Eventually, this makes the courses archaic and disconnected from the latest happenings in their respective fields. In turn, students who go on to study find themselves bored and frustrated as neither they can relate to them nor they can learn anything of value that they can apply today. To solve this problem, the prompt here recommends that educators should take note of the interests and suggestions that their students give them as they would be more motivated to study when they eventually take up such courses. Undoubtedly, the thought is justified for the following reasons.
To begin with, as courses students would take up are now designed by taking into consideration their suggestions, they are more easily able to relate to them and are not easily bored or frustrated when studying them. Rather, they are motivated towards studying these courses as they are now more closely relatable. In, a recent survey conducted by Miranda research institute in over two thousand research institutes, it was found that in institutes where student choices were considered while designing courses a greater percentage of students found the curriculum engaging and were more interested in studying these courses. On the other hand, in educational institutes where children had to take up predesigned courses, it was found that a greater percentage of students were less inclined to actively take part in studies and would get bored and frustrated easily.
Secondly, interest in studies directly translates to better academic performance, which is the dream of any educator that a large portion of his students performs well on the subject matter. As students are now taking up courses in which they have greater interest their academic performance naturally improves. In the same survey aforementioned it was also found that students who were studying courses in which they had actively participated in designing them were showing better academic performance when compared to those students who were just taking up courses that were predesigned and did not involve any student participation in course planning. A better academic performance later translates into a better career which is in line with the goal of education which is to provide students with appropriate skills to get lucrative jobs. In an alumni survey conducted by the same institute, it was found that alumni from batches that gave freedom to its students to suggest changes or additions when courses were getting planned enjoyed a higher level of success in their careers when compared to those batches of students who were not given this choice.
In conclusion, we can say that taking into account student interests and suggestions into consideration when designing courses not only makes them more motivated to study but also leads to better academic performance and in turn a better career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ts performs well on the subject matter. As students are now taking up courses in w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 30.0 11.3162921348 265% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2644.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.288 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76880913029 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.2242949486 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.25 118.986275619 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430953341184 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159362288814 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991725230776 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297457576009 0.150359130593 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192176021002 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.