Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the exte

Essay topics:

Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

With the fast-developing society, education not only becomes more and more significant to us but also become more and more challenge. The claim is reasonable and promising in terms of educators taking consideration of providing a lecture based on the interests and suggestions of students. However, the step of reforming the course should meet the level of education as well as the phrase of students who have interests in the learning materials.

For students who are in the courses of liberal arts and humanity courses at college or universities, the plan to replace the long and boring lectures is delightful. The variety of courses based on interests will bring lights to students and inspire them to further their research in the future. Communication and discussion value much in cultivating studying ability and thinking in the study field of liberal arts. The interests generated by curiosity motive students explore deeper into the world. Meanwhile, this possibility <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">would be enlarged if the professor who </span>offering lectures concerning more about the interests of students. Otherwise, the long lectures and archive of research literature can do nothing but burying student’s curiosity.

While appreciating the forthcoming in the higher education in terms of course designing, the other ways to interact between educators and students are above discussion and communication, such as infant level, elementary school, and short-term training institution. In this case, the courses designed based on the knowledge and career’s need instead of interest to learn. Moreover, educators must insist on their way to mark themselves by strict and professional because the passion devoted to studying will largely come from the need for livelihood and basic skill in society. Driven by interests, the teenager students will take idols, live shows precedence over pursuing knowledge of architectures, physic, and archeology. However, these types of knowledge will lead to their cognitive development and open a door for their career in the future. Educators who work at this level would not manage their lesson according to students’ desires.

Admittedly, the interest in a subject leads a student to study it best. Nonetheless, interest alone cannot offer a long system for long-term studying. If students have great performance in subjects they interested in, the other subjected should not lag the list of study.

Therefore, even though planning a course as a commitment to students’ studying interest is appreciated, educators should consider the level of the course. Although the saying that “interest is the best teacher” known to us, other motivations all need in our society full of challenges for students.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bests', 'wells'?
Suggestion: bests; wells
...n a subject leads a student to study it best. Nonetheless, interest alone cannot off...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, of course, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.6327345309 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 2260.96107784 105% => OK
No of words: 424.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61320754717 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30079496773 2.78398813304 119% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554245283019 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3997747742 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.70786347227 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.20758483034 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282436133635 0.218282227539 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895882222592 0.0743258471296 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533894426458 0.0701772020484 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167910354322 0.128457276422 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468870602948 0.0628817314937 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.3799401198 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.3550499002 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.5979740519 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 98.500998004 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.