Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
For a person to be proficient in any field, it is essential he has enough theory and practical in it. As having hands-on experience is crucial to achieve excellence, I agree with the statement that academic institutions should make it mandatory for it's faculty members to gain some work experience in the field they are studying. I hold this opinion for two reasons which I will explore in the essay.
Firstly, many a times, the faculty members keep teaching in academic settings for a very long period of time. This causes their teachings to be monotonous and highly bookish. Some of the points they teach may not even have practical relevance anymore. For example, a teacher in a law school who keeps teaching students how to go about legal proceedings to fight cases, may not have set foot in a courtroom for years. Thus his teachings, which are hardly based on practical knowledge may misguide the pupils. If he spends few weeks every year gaining practical experience in the field, he maybe able to give the students more in-depth teaching of the subject.
Furthermore, there are may new discoveries and inventions that keep taking place. It may not always to be possible to learn about them via the medium of reference books or magazines. Unless the faculty member has a practical experience with this new development in his field, he will not be able to properly teach his students about it. For example, a new surgical technique has been invented. A medical school professor must first observe and is possible perform it before teaching the aspiring medical students about it.
However, it may not always be feasible for faculty members to get working experience regularly about the courses taught by them. For example, some faculty members maybe too old to be able to work and get professional experience.
Thus, in conclusion, I feel that since practical experience helps the professors get a better perspective of the field and familiarize themselves with the latest developments,it should be made mandatory for most of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
... explore in the essay. Firstly, many a times, the faculty members keep teaching in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng in academic settings for a very long period of time. This causes their teachings to be mono...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...gs to be monotonous and highly bookish. Some of the points they teach may not even have pra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...have set foot in a courtroom for years. Thus his teachings, which are hardly based o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... themselves with the latest developments,it should be made mandatory for most of t...
^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emselves with the latest developments,it should be made mandatory for most of the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99122807018 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75508272684 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1599324851 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.411764706 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138613696131 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485357521613 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506488845898 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796299168565 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419594527738 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.