Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Knowledge is power - the power that can shape and develop the future of mankind, the whole world. But to gain this power, a proper and effective way of acquiring knowledge is mandatory. Knowledge that is not associated with reality cannot be of greater value than the knowledge that derives from experience and pragmatism. The policy stated in the prompt sets a requirement for all faculty to spend time outside their academic world and work on professions relevant to the courses. I strongly agree to assuming this policy, for two reasons.
Firstly, only bookish knowledge is not enough for gathering knowledge required to teach their students, working knowledge is also vital. In other words, if one does not possess the use and scope of their knowledge, one cannot teach their disciples effectively. Implementing the policy stated will have immense help in teaching and growing interest among the students. By working in relevant professions will make the faculties aware of the practical implementations of the academic field. They can enlighten the students, discuss how they can use the information they are gleaning merely from their academic curriculum. For example, a professor teaching robotics can teach their students about the microcontroller and actuators etc. But when the students know about their use in industries and other sectors, this actually gives them a purpose and grows the interest essential to gain a positive and long-term outcome from the course they are taking. This is no wonder when a professor associated with fabrication and design in lunar rovers interests his students in them too. Thus implementing the aforementioned policy really brings positive effects on the academic achievements and careers.
Further, if someone has no experience of working in relevant jobs, or at least consulting the job professionals, he or she will not know about the practical barriers of the implementation of their theoretical knowledge. Unaware of the limits, s/he will not even try to overcome them by finding the reasons behind he problems and developing a solution using their academic virtues. Getting to know the real world limits only can help them advance in their strive for solving problems. In the implementation of any theory, there remains some pracitcal barriers, some error associated with them. For example, we solve many numerical problems by using various numerical analysis methods. But all methods are not suitable for all kinds of problems - there exists no panacea. So there are even distinct departments whose sole goal is to find the proper methods for different practical problems, to introduce new modifications and incorporate them to minimize errors in measurements and calculations. So knowing practical barriers of implementations is vital for one's academic field to grow and flourish.
One might argue that spending time outside their academic environment might be a waste of valuable time of their academic life. But that is totally wrong. Almost every professor in any universities are associated with working, developing working principles of industries or at least, consultation jobs in any practical field. This makes academic knowledge contribute to public services directly- with twofold benefits, as it helps the academicians too in the ways explained above. So the policy that requires faculties to work in relevant jobs should be implemented for the immense benefit it will bring to the general public, students and faculties themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'behind the problems'?
Suggestion: behind the problems
...to overcome them by finding the reasons behind he problems and developing a solution using their a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 612, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...he immense benefit it will bring to the general public, students and faculties themselves.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, really, so, thus, at least, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2956.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38433515483 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93553564243 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499089253188 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 925.2 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6819385115 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.481481481 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238685180662 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066403871353 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775313710337 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155776970488 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414552374893 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.