Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

With the advent of technology, many services and gadgets, that were unimaginable in the early times, are now essential to our day to day life. Smartphones are one of those wonders of science, which are basically mini-computers, so to speak, that too in the size of our palms. Personally, I believe that smarphones provide man benefits to the users. Therefore, I do not agree with the prompt stating that, smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First, the smartphones provide us with numerous benefits, way more than just the basic feature of calling and messaging. Using today's smartphones, one can find their routes on maps online, manage daily schedule, perform calculations, store big amounts of data and many more. Services like data management, time management and most importantly connecting effectively with people has made the users' everyday lives easier than they ever were. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Before having a smartphone, I had to carry a notebook all the time to keep track of the upcoming events in my schedule. However, I used to misplace the notebook frequently. On top of that, there was no way a to set reminders that could notify me of the even at a certain time. But using a smartphone, I can organize my plans effectively and receive timely reminders. This has made my life way more organized. Clearly, a smartphone can help people lead a better life by providing numerous services and features.

Furthermore, some downsides of using smartphones can be solved by the smartphone itself as well as changing the mindset of the users in question. The main downside of using a smartphone is addiction to smartphone, which brings about other problems such as eye problems, headache, insomnia, migrain, shoulder-ache etc. as a result of looking at the screen for a long periond. To solve this problem, there are usage managements apps, that can regulate the amount of time spent on the phone. For instance, if a person sets their daily limit of app usage to a certain amount of time, he/she will not be able to access their phone or that particular app after that much time is up. This cancels out one of the main downside of using smartphones.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that smartphones are not harmful, rather it brings about great benefits to the society. The apparent downsides can be eliminated by a refined mindset of the users and sometimes even the smartphone itself can come to the rescue.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llowing essay. First, the smartphones provide us with numerous benefits, way m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, so to speak, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92165898618 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8524079988 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2159576713 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8695652174 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8695652174 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08695652174 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182600588557 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517462324228 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814157309103 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111368049694 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787103631814 0.0645574589148 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.