Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the advent of science and technology, there exist many ways for disseminating information throughout the world. The most popular media are paper materials, videography, audio, live shows, radio, television etc. Paper materials are undoubtedly the most ancient among them. The prompt states that we can gain information better from reading paper materials that from watching electronic devices. I strongly disagree with the statement for the following reasons.
Firstly, paper materials are secondary sources for gaining information as we have to look at any incident with someone else's eyes. To put it in another way, information on any paper material is written by someone who has witnessed it and then put the information into written materials in order to disseminate information. Sometimes it can be even tertiary information. Situations frequently arise, where the authencity of the information presented in the paper materials proves questionable. On the other hand, on electronic devices we can watch anything first-hand, and acquire more accurate information. We can watch the incident directly on our devices with nobody working as mediums between us and the news.
Furthermore, there are scopes for data manipulation in paper materials. One can easily talk about an incident in a way they want people to know. For instance, if a criminal writes his autobiography glorifying his crimes as greatness and intelligent endeavors, people might have a take at his crimes different from the actual one and grow sympathy for them. If they rather watched videos of his wrongdoings and heinous crimes, they would have a more clear idea that adheres to the truth. Incompetent writers can also unintentionally present facts in a way that is not adherent to the reality. So watching videographys on electronic decives better serves the purpose of gaining information in this case.
Lastly, there remain great scopes for bias as the incident can be described from a certain perspective. If an author decides to describe a political era as a very successful and completely peaceful one, the future generations acquiring information from the paper material will learn it that way. Now if the author were biased towards the ruling goverment in that period, his statements might not hold water when compared to the reality, as there might be some turbulent times which the author intentionally omitted in his writings. This can leave people misguided and misinformed, Watching incidents and documentaries on electronic devices solves this dilemma and provides more accurate presentation of any incident without any bias.
So from the discussion above, we can see that paper materials are susceptible to manipulation, bias and inaccuracy, which is not the case for watching electronic devices. Therefore, we should always try to get our hands on sustainable evidences liek videography, audio recording etc while gaining information to be sure of the accuracy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, look, second, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40820734341 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01556743183 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537796976242 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0238092613 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.869565217 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1304347826 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227121700415 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737356819009 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660402947051 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142637188619 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774628989626 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.