Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny the benefits of both sides to acquire information. If i were forced to take side, I would definetly support the electronic devices to gain information. I will give explanations in the subsequent paragraphs for taking this side.
First of all, it actually brodens our sphere to gain information. Electronic devices have opened the doors of all kind informaton. Anyone can have access to aquire anykind of information now. For example, if anyone wants to know about about cancers, he/she can easily access to that information by googling. Anyone can go to this search engine anytime for free through various smart electronic gadgets like smartphone, tabs, laptops. Other than google there are lots of alternatives for getting information. Sometimes I think if there were no electronic devices or google, how difficult the life would be for getting information easily. Moreover, anyone can easily store their information what they learn while using devices. For reading paper materials, it is much more challenging to manage information, because their is no swift option like cloud storges, google noots, tasks. That's why electronic devices are much better option.
Further, electronic devices offer both audio and visual media along with reading to obtain information. Today's world is dynamic world where someone required facilities to up-to-date with the currents world. Audio and visuals are more effective to keep information in heads more readily and easily. It also helps to save time in comparable to reading paper materials to gain information. For example, when I use television to learn about some specific topics, It seems more easier to me to catch that reading on that topic in paper. I imagine, if there were no television, It would be hard for myself to learn something easily.
In conclusion, the elctronic devices provide much more option to gain knowledge rather than paper reading materials. I firmly take side for electronic devices due to aformentioned reasons and explanations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...f both sides to acquire information. If i were forced to take side, I would defin...
^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: about
...w. For example, if anyone wants to know about about cancers, he/she can easily access to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'managing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: managing
... materials, it is much more challenging to manage information, because their is no swift ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...llenging to manage information, because their is no swift option like cloud storges, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 881, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ike cloud storges, google noots, tasks. Thats why electronic devices are much better ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 469, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...rn about some specific topics, It seems more easier to me to catch that reading on that top...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, moreover, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31152647975 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80299055449 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2241889243 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1904761905 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218525928273 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682500199884 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523448900909 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14161429487 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456410367 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.