Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In this fast world, today's generation wants everything quick and readymade, we live on ready to eat meals. In this 21st century, I believe watching information on electronic devices is better than reading it in paper. I will eleborate on this in following passages.
Nowadays people don't have time to read paper thats why it has become outdated. Smartphones have given access to everything on our fingertips. I think that while reading paper it requires more time than watching it on TV or smartphones. It saves so much of our time, which we can use to finish some other works.
Moreover, we can multitask, for example, we can do some other chores or work while watching TV. I use to watch movie on TV while cooking or even doing my homework. We cannot perform any other task at the same time read an interesting book.
Further, I prefer watching news on TV rather than reading it in newspaper. Because, firstly we get paper on the next day which mean it contains news from day before, and secondly, news on TV gives summary of the entire news which I don't get in the paper. Paper has lengthy paragraphs, it consumes so much of my time, however I watch it on TV or Mobile which gives me highlights of the news.
Finally, producing paper requires lot of machineries, materials, whereas typing news and uploading it takes less expenses than setting up a newspaper factory.
To sum up, using electronic devices has overthrown all paper idustries as they are fast, requires less expenses, and availabel wherever and whenever we want. These are the reasons why pape based mails and paper insudtries are going out of business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... following passages. Nowadays people dont have time to read paper thats why it ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ays people dont have time to read paper thats why it has become outdated. Smartphones...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...her chores or work while watching TV. I use to watch movie on TV while cooking or e...
^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ives summary of the entire news which I dont get in the paper. Paper has lengthy par...
^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...reas typing news and uploading it takes less expenses than setting up a newspaper fa...
^^^^
Line 11, column 99, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...er idustries as they are fast, requires less expenses, and availabel wherever and wh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 283.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78091872792 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6224366806 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2424488991 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5625 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204612242719 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762624782297 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740001946533 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10512760413 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407990702829 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.