The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of
human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans are the most superior creation in the entire history of Earth as we know of, with respect to intelligence, creativity & civilization. We are believed to have the most complex mind able to do amazing things. Still, there goes a saying, 'To err is human'. And to reduce the error and make lives more agreeable, humans invented machines, also machines that can fabricate machines. Now the author suggests that whatever the limit to which the ability of the machine culminates up to, human mind will always be superior to machines because they are merely the creations of human minds. I mostly disagree with the statement, due to three reasons.
Firstly, we have to define in what context are we measuring our superiority. Are we talking about the complex and time consuming iterative analysis of a fluid flow model? Or stress analysis of a intricately shaped object? In this cases, with respect to the parameters of time consumption and accuracy of the result produced by human minds can not parallel that of machines. We all know how machines are replacing people in the job sector and industries. So the superiority of human minds does not hold water. But if we talk about thinking out of the box, exploring endless possibilities independently, machines are always bound to a limit which does not apply to humans. So the superiority might be there, depending on the context. So we can rule out the possibilities of utmost superiority.
Further, If we recall the three rules behind Artificial Intelligence, that bounds the machines to an ever-limiting position. But that also suggests, if those rules are not followed, the emergence of machines as a superior being with a power over humanity is possible. Numerous science fiction literatures and movies have portrayed this occurrence, though unrealistic and impractical for now, the future lies ahead with many unprecedented things that are above our imagination. Providing minds to a powerful creations might backfire on humanity as they try to gain superiority and control over their own creators. We have seen recently, how some intelligent robots made for conversational purpose, while in a talk, have showed unexpectedly dark disposition that led to putting them down considering them as a potential threat. So their effort to gain superiority over humanity in future cannot be completely ruled out.
Now the reason I 'mostly' disagreed to the prompt stated is that there has been no substantial evidence of the machines revolting against human till now. The ideas have always been limited to entertainment purpose in books and movies. Proper methods and principles are established to prevent machines going out of hand.
The issue provided is very complex and requires a scientific viewpoint as well as a philosophical one. Time only can answer to this question. The creator versus creation collision might occur in future, what do we know? Thus, the superiority of human mind over machines cannot be completely supported just because the machines are used by the humans themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fluid flow model? Or stress analysis of a intricately shaped object? In this case...
^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ysis of a intricately shaped object? In this cases, with respect to the parameters o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...r versus creation collision might occur in future, what do we know? Thus, the superiority...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, thus, well, while, talking about, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2555.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15120967742 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91327800354 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536290322581 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 824.4 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.656986684 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.67857142857 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281744498946 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754152959324 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076915454576 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170716911235 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598823809881 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.