Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to that they teach.
In today's world, we are witnessing wholesale changes in every industry whether it be science and technology, healthcare, agriculture, business and what not. Also, these changes are brought about in a very rapid pace giving an individual very minimal or no time in getting acquainted to them. The faculty members of a college or a university teach students what they have experienced and what they studied when they were younger. At times, they fail to keep their teachings up to the mark with the latest inventions and discovery. So to keep up with today's pace, a hands-on experience along with teaching would be of great benefit not only to the students but also to themselves. So, I truly believe that colleges and universities should require their faculty to work outside to get a clearer picture.
The academic world is an important cog for every country and has many factors influencing it. The more experienced the faculty is, the better understanding he/she has and together make a country's academic field richer. For instance, consider the example of the former President of India Mr. APJ Abdul Kalam. Before entering into politics he was a great teacher. His teachings in the field of science and technology mainly astronomy was not only influenced by what he studied when he was younger but his overall hands-on experience in working with ISRO simultaneously played a great part in his teachings. He was better equipped to teach students what he experienced and could delineate each and every work he did in ISRO along with his teaching. His teachings benefitted the students in a great way and as a result of that boosted the academics in India to greater heights.
However, I do feel that working along with teaching can be quite burdensome but the reality today is that no one will ask you if your overall development is not that good. A good balance between both must be the primary goal of the teacher and should work whole-heartedly towards it. For instance, the academic policy in China is such that it requires its academic professors and other faculty members to get an industry job before getting into teaching. I feel this is a very fruitful idea and can be advantageous in many ways as it will help in overall development.
Therefore, in conclusion, I would say that experience is a key factor in every aspect and must be given a great deal of importance. The more the teachers get acquainted to newer technology, the better it will be for students' understanding and pave way for greater success in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...President of India Mr. APJ Abdul Kalam. Before entering into politics he was a great t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... His teachings benefitted the students in a great way and as a result of that boosted the aca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith teaching can be quite burdensome but the reality today is that no one will as...
^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...anding and pave way for greater success in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87962962963 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79380791292 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502314814815 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4967531098 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.947368421 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214418427823 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662731477263 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770334607542 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116305041561 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904291990739 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.