Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Colleges and universities are places which require carefully designed policies and plans - which is generally the case - because they are one of the most sensitive of the fields, as the manpower that is produced by them are focal to the development and progress of any nation. The author, here, claims that the colleges and universities should ask of their faculties to work outside of the college/university premises in vocations that are relevant to the courses they teach. I mostly agree with the author that the faculties should be required to experience the nature of professions that are directly related to their courses for two reasons. Yet, in some cases, this requirement from the teachers/lecturers can turn out to be taxing, leading to rather decreased effectiveness of the teaching-learning.
There should definitely be a connecting link between the academic arena and the actual profession, which the universities and colleges are preparing the students for. At times, the requirements of a profession related to a course being taught at the colleges, might be different from the skills that are imparted to a student at the college. A novice at a profession is almost certainly to have some sorts of discomforts or uneasiness at doing works. If the above-mentioned policy is implemented, the apparent gap is abridged to some extent, because the faculties would now be cognizant of the requirements of the profession, and thus can integrate those skills in their teaching-learning practice. The faculties would come to know about the dynamics of the job-markets, their tendencies and shifts, changing nature of the job requirements etc.
Besides preparing the students for job markets, implementing this policy would foster the problem-solving capacity of the students, because the students, themselves, are the workforce of the future. The faculties as they are aware of the comforts and difficulties of the professions, can impart a good insight into the problem-solving skills of their students. A computer engineer at a college, however talented he may be, may have some difficulties regarding the accomplishment of the works as demanded by the profession. It is where, the policy would come to the rescue - preparing the students for the worst or best possible scenarios through valuable experience, albeit second-hand, at the profession itself.
While certainly the policy would bring forth a lot of benefits, there are few thing that might not be too encouraging. Requiring to do multiple tasks at the same time could exhaust the faculties of energy, potentially waning the efficacy of the teaching-learning process. Some field of academics, which are already quite energy-demanding, might not benefit too much from this policy. Well, researchers don not have exactly a profession, do they? The policy would thus could as of little significance in such cases.
In a nutshell, the author proposition that the faculties in colleges and universities should work outside of the academic world, if implemented, would be quite beneficial to both the sides - the academics and the professional field, yet some exceptions exist, whose shortcomings are easily outweighed by the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'few things'.
Suggestion: few things
...ring forth a lot of benefits, there are few thing that might not be too encouraging. Requ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'things'?
Suggestion: things
... forth a lot of benefits, there are few thing that might not be too encouraging. Requ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...might not be too encouraging. Requiring to do multiple tasks at the same time could e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, thus, well, while, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2709.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38568588469 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31728569437 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491053677932 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4656359823 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.578947368 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4736842105 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306070123984 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902288432882 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1057462793 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179013534798 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112504819508 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.