Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit

Essay topics:

Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

A faculty who teaches in the colleges and universities can be considered as the future of the nation as they are more likely to shape the future of young students. Therefore, "effect of faculties on the young students" are a substantial topic to discuss. According to me, I mostly disagree with the claimed statement that as a profession, a faculty should concentrate more on the outside world professions rather than courses he teaches.

Firstly, Faculty's teaching and academic activities help them to be more focused on their profession and make remarkable innovations. For instance, A eminent math professor who is working with different numerical solutions of heat transfer or fluid mechanics if imposed to spend time outside his carrier and courses, he can not be focused on that topic and at the same time that will made him distracted from his work. At the same time any remarkable publication needs a lot of perseverance and dedication but spending time on other courses will not bring fruitful results.

Secondly, Effect of a Profession in Academic world is not broader rather than deeper. For instance, as a subject chemistry may sound vast. But a faculty generally works with a very specific part of it and dig deeper to innovate new inventions and reports or publications that are effective for outside world. Therefore, outside world will be more effective with more vigorous assessment of a topic which is possible only if a faculty is bound with his topic and work pedantically.

However, it may be sound true that sticking with only academic world can make a faculty more rigid and narrow his or her outlook. For instance, a statistics professor can work rigidly with with previous methods of computing rather than adapting some new machine learning approaches that are closely relevant with his or her work. If he have the opportunity to spend time outside his works to explore, that will broadens his view and that can be implemented in future work that can help to research more effectively.

So to conclude, a faculty should spend his time meticulously on his academic professions to grow his carrier more effectively for future innovations and for the support of his student as well as he or she can be adaptive to outside knowledge that can be implemented to get better result.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...os; are a substantial topic to discuss. According to me, I mostly disagree with the claimed sta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: with
...a statistics professor can work rigidly with with previous methods of computing rather th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 337, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ly relevant with his or her work. If he have the opportunity to spend time outside h...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0207253886 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88543821828 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471502590674 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7085199185 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231759580856 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939171564752 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277667996488 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14672348723 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022394223774 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.