Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.

Email is most common communication medium used in corporate world. Email helps you to send your message across the world in minutes. Each employee of a company has their email account configured. It is very important for the company to monitor the email correspondence of the employee. It will help the company very well.

If the company starts monitoring email correspondence, then employees will not misuse the email account of the company. Employees tend to make personal emails and emails that are not relevant to the company. Monitoring will reduce this activities and it will also make employees feel that there is someone who is monitoring these emails. It will cut short the personal work related mails of employees.

Monitoring of email correspondence will also help company to reduce their system capacity of email storage. If company knows what system size is required for particular level of employees, it can configure that particular level of employees will get only limited amount of system space. This will reduce unnecessary mails being kept in the system space and only relevant email will remain in the system. Other mails can be archived and deleted. This can save lot of money required for system space and it can be invested at other place.

Sometimes companies are involved in lawsuits for violating laws made for emails. This situation can be omitted by having monitoring in place for email correspondence. If the company is monitoring the emails, it can know about what can potentially violate restrictions of email. So the company can simply reject that email and protect itself from involving in lawsuits at later stage. This way monitoring of email correspondence can protect company from lawsuits.

Someone can argue that putting so many restrictions and monitoring on email correspondence may hamper company's image and there exists a case where the employees may not prefer the company for work as other companies may not have this much restrictions. But this monitoring and restrictions will eventually help company from wasting its resources and it will save time and money for the company. It is possible that other companies will also start this kind of monitoring and restrictions on email because of previous consequences. So it is better to have monitoring of email which will help the company grow better.

In nutshell, we can say that monitoring of email correspondence helps company is many ways staring from saving time and money to saving system space and protecting it from lawsuits. So for betterment of the company, it should conduct routine monitoring of all employee email correspondence.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... to the company. Monitoring will reduce this activities and it will also make employ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...rk as other companies may not have this much restrictions. But this monitoring and r...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19392523364 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84889166657 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422897196262 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7574849623 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.92 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.12 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35607364968 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132715543938 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807592136897 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227563226501 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630084168113 0.0667264976115 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.