Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
E-mail is one of the major communication media in the modern era especially for the formal communication. Indeed, monitoring the e-mail correspondence of all the workers of a company will help to curtail such technical resources like time & e-mail storage capacity. Yet, it can not be necessarily supported as monitoring this is including some cardinal factor like privacy, cost & company reputation. For saving some minor resources it can not be justified to compromise with the major fact of the company on which companies overall profit is depended.
The first ineluctable point which has assailed with the statement is the privacy. Monitoring each & every workers e-mail does not seem so attractive as it is a great stymie for workers personal email privacy. For example, a worker can talk with his or her personal individual. So if the company want to enter on that conversation for protecting company lawsuits, that workers should not be feel comfort to work on that company. In consequence applying this rule, it can be happened a lot of workers are leaving the company.
Another telling fact is the money. For monitoring this the e-mails the company should need a software which can monitor the e-mails. This may cost a lot of money which can not be replaced with showing the cause of protecting lawsuits or saving resources. For instance, in Bangladesh the Anti-corruption office invested a lot of amount money just to connect all the computers by a software. But this great investment of them does not yet get any profit after six years has passed on. Hence, this statement implication can consequence a lot of money waste of the company.
Indisputably, this implication can save some technical resources like time & the email storage capacity. Besides that, after applying this the companies HR department can feel quite relax as the company will get some extent of protection of law. However, the amount of this profits are questionable. Because the time for giving the email correspondence is nugatory & the email capacity is more than enough in every website. For instance, Google give 15 GB drive space for email which can storage an abundance of email. Also, the lawsuits can still not be protectable fully because hacking form outside can be happened anytime.
In recapitulation, though the statement is meretricious but trenchant of the positive & negative side reveals that imposing the statement is less benign as expected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Monitoring each & every workers e-mail does not seem so attractive as it is a g...
^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g resources. For instance, in Bangladesh the Anti-corruption office invested a lo...
^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...sh the Anti-corruption office invested a lot of amount money just to connect all the computers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 270, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...otection of law. However, the amount of this profits are questionable. Because the t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Google give 15 GB drive space for email which can storage an abundance of email....
^^
Line 17, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In recapitulation, though the statement is meretricious but trenchant of the pos...
^^
Line 17, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he positive & negative side reveals that imposing the statement is less benign as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17587939698 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91435773907 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492462311558 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6523610607 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6363636364 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206348458908 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656533574441 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933854473098 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115865801314 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908437366396 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.