Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev

Essay topics:

Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

While the statement has its value on evaluating the weakness that only pursuing higher grades during the high education process, the shortness is tending to convince readers that it is inappropriate in all education level. Also, chasing for a high-grade is not always being a limitation in the learning process. Therefore, I disagree with the statement because of its partial standpoint. I will explain my standpoint from the definitions of competition and quality of learning below college education level perspective then leads to my conclusion that they are not always limiting the school’s performance at all educational institutions.

Competition in the classroom is very common as it is everywhere in our society. It is the force pushing people to overcome difficulties, reach their higher goals, and grasp more knowledge. Owing to the competition, students spend more time and actively participate in learning, discussion, and project process. Because of chasing higher grade coming from the want of our nature to compete, it is a very critical reason for our social progress too. From sports, arts to sciences, competition is everywhere and give us hope that we can do better than others, which turns out to keep our society growing. Competition is not a limitation in all kinds of fields. However, sometimes, competition does bring harm to students because the score cheating, school bully and exclusion will prevent some students from learning harder. Although the situation is true, the harm is not caused by competition on school performance, but because of the wrong strategies to win the competition. People should not forget the competition because some people pursuit it using the wrong ways. If without competition on grades, students wonder rather spend more time on TV and hanging out, which increase other problems.

Competition in grades gives some kids the choice that they could be successful in the future because they study hard and study more. In school systems, especially from elementary to high school, higher grades receivers are more tend to be a deep and fast learner. Many scientists in their memo had stated that studying goes with them during long and lonely children. In addition, studying gave them the pride to be a different kid with their classmates. Despite that during high school, we tend to dislike those super-smart kids. However, we also inspired by their great school performances so that study harder than usual. Therefore, it is precious that students want to surpass top students’ grades.

The quality of learning very needs competition to improve. Leaning quality is good or not depend on how often come to cross the same puzzle and how much can understand during a lecture. Learning is a long process. Many people think they learned a lot but without reviewing, they will forget the knowledge they just grasped very quickly. However, the stress and anxiety from the competition is a reminder to our brain to study more and remember better. In the high school system, students meet their fastest nerve growing period, the competition will certainly help them study better.

In conclusion, although some students may cheat in school performance to get a higher grade. Their behaviors will frustrate other students to study more. In most cases, competition is effective to inspire students learning more and deeper, therefore, they have better learning quality during the school.

Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... all education level. Also, chasing for a high-grade is not always being a limitation in the...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in most cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2902.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 551.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2667876588 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80095866013 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497277676951 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6481510888 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3666666667 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26666666667 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158981278368 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472666852576 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437698667579 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980199990197 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573025579431 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.