Cooperation and competition are essential for an healthy society; hence, none can function as the sole form of interaction required to prepare young people for leadership. Cooperation and Competition are unique in the advantages and limitations they bring to the society. Hence, there is a need for a careful decision which should be made based on various societal sector to determine the form of interaction required to prepare individuals for leadership.
Cooperation promotes judicious use of scarce resources. Hence, it would be wise for young people in the sectors of the society where resources needed for their development are scarce to collaborate. This collaboration would lead to a maximal use of resources. During the world war two, America nuclear bomb project is an example of the enormous power that cooperation brings to the society. The cooperation of diverse young minds of the moment led to the outstanding success scored by the USA.
However, competition is often a chief precursor for innovation. While cooperation leads to dependence and a regimented way of carrying out tasks, competition leads to innovation. Individuals are wired differently; often times, this differences affects their judgement and consequently their actions. While cooperation would stiffle innovaton, competition promotes it.as. After the victory scored by America by the atomic bomb, the competition with the USSR led to innovation and improvement of proccesses.
A society should prepare its young leaders by viewing the different sectors and its need. While cooperation will suit sectors with high resource requirements, competition will suit sectors where innovation is required. A proper evaluation will decide how young people should be trained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ation and competition are essential for an healthy society; hence, none can functi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 266.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6015037594 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08626239105 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2279348121 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6875 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202722849707 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657647936254 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433291616428 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12254632736 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356360749504 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.