Art creation is a complex phenomena. It would be difficult to predict what would be the next creation of an artist for the fact that, he himself has wage idea if not no clue about it. though the creativity demands a boundless horizon to express, there needs to be certain restrictions as well, considering the immense impact art has on our lives.
Imagination of an artist is boundless. He could create, something that has never happened before. Apart from being a form of entertainment, such creativity has immensely influenced science - which in turn has contributed for the better living we have today. Inventions of flying machines, speaking to somebody at a distance were a poetic constructs in appealing writings before there actual invention. These writings have surely influenced final invention. Recently mark zukerburg, the co-founder of facebook(a social media platform), built an artificial human assistant named JARVIS, inspired and named after it's influence from marvel comic universe JARVIS - the assistant of iron man. So restricting such creativity is in a way precluding the possibility of such inventions.
On the other hand, like art influences the good, it can also influence bad. It's evident how much our generation is influenced by movies from the fact that hollywood has grown in to a multi billion dollar industry. A movie, a song or even a book can also influence negative things, especially to kids who are more innocent. After all, the creative person is also a human being and there is a possibility of him having thoughts that could harm society intentionally or unintentionally. To avoid such possibilities, there should be certain level of restriction on what should be art and what audience it can be presented to. The existing laws to restrict certain violent , abusive content to be watched by age group below 18 is commendable in this regard.
so to summarize, Artists do need creative freedom to expand there horizon. However there should be a restriction on creation that could influence in the innocents in negative way. Again, this ability of government to restrict art, should not be misused for propaganda were only certain ideologies are allowed to be expressed in art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
Art creation is a complex phenomena. It would be difficult to predict what ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... level of restriction on what should be art and what audience it can be presented t...
^^^
Line 5, column 668, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xisting laws to restrict certain violent , abusive content to be watched by age gr...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ow 18 is commendable in this regard. so to summarize, Artists do need creative ...
^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eative freedom to expand there horizon. However there should be a restriction on creati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, after all, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14681440443 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94380406435 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592797783934 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3575344298 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7894736842 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24064842961 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703388487479 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792841840259 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166277460353 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839036966095 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.