Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing or supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be sed to challenge your position.
Intelligence, is a very vague and complex term. It cannot be trivially determined by measuring a few features or characteristics of a person. Hence, one cannot equate intelligence to a sum of a few properties. Thus, using creativity, which is itself a vague characteristic, as the sole determinant of intelligence is massively flawed.
Firstly, One can only make simplistic correlations between intelligence and certain qualities of a person, and that too under the given context. In the case of a university lecturer, we may conclude that a Professor is intelligent if he or she has a deep understanding of their relevant field. True, Creativity can play a minor role in the assesment but it certainly cannot be the only true measure of intelligence in such a scenario. Another example is that of a group leader. An intelligent leader should be capable of emphathising with the members and push them forward. Again, creativity can enhance the capabilities of the leader, but it cannot make up for their lack of, say, emotional quotient.
Secondly, creativity does not directly imply intelligence, there is no causative relation between the two. There can be many creative ways to tie up strings but that doesn't imply the it is intelligent. Many times artists attribute their revolutionary music or art to their subconscious working with no mental supervision. This would mean that there was no conscious effort or thinking which went into the work, but its creative aspects cannot be denied.
It can be argued that creativity is a pre-requisite for intelligence. However, it alone cannot be used to measure intellectual capability. Leonardo da Vinci was a great artist and scientist. He was a marvel quite ahead of his time. But his genious cannot be attributed solely to his creative mind. He was a meticulous and critical thinker, which made him the personality that he was.
In conclusion, creativity alone cannot be a measure of intelligence. Both intelligence and creativity are vague in themselves and not quantitatively measurable. They do not have a causative relation and hence, they cannot be used for measurements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of intelligence is massively flawed. Firstly, One can only make simplistic co...
^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...reative ways to tie up strings but that doesnt imply the it is intelligent. Many times...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...to tie up strings but that doesnt imply the it is intelligent. Many times artists attr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20520231214 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28097317745 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8850895016 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3043478261 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0434782609 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212043392062 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659308486055 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569941643155 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124162205003 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170428682695 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.