The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement above and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how those considerations shape your position.
It is not possible to quantitatively measure an idea, and hence we cannot simply conclude weather an idea is the 'best'. Despite the complexity of the problem, one can use a superficial indicator as a measuring tape, such as the number of people who were benefitted from the idea. It is undeniable that ideas can spring from any source of inspiration, they can be the mundane or the extraordinary. However, history has shown time and again that ideas that revolutionised human lifestyle more often arose from the observations of commonplace things rather than the fantastical. Food is such an example, which is commonplace and has seen a quantum leap improvement in quantity and quality. The passionate research done by genetic engineers in the common grain now fills the stomach of more than half the globe.
Polio is a disease which was rampant only two generations ago, but has now been curbed by the polio vaccine. In those days polio was commomplace and an accepted fate amongst those afflicted by it. Had it not been for Jonas Salk's interest in this omnipresent malady, the polio vaccine would have never come into existence. Technology and science constantly improves the quality of living, and this leads the people to forget about the problems of the old which plagued almost everyone. Hence, our current generation does not know about several of the daily problems that our grandparents faced because they were resolved by the research and efforts of people who were passionate about it.
Another such an example is the modern motor vehicle. Henry Ford brought about a radical change in transportation with his first car model. At a time when all transportation were either horse or mule driven, the Ford model gave the people an alternative. Horse-driven carts were the norm and only someone interested in the workings of something quotdian would even think of inventing a new vehicle.
It is true that not all ideas which are deemed 'great' are necessarily intertwined with common life. The formulation of general relativity by Einstein is one such example. It is undeniably a major progress in theoretical physics, which has continued to baffle physicists. Nonetheless, if we measure its importance in terms of number of people affected, then it would not rank very high. This is not surprising, since esoteric ideas tend to be appreciated only by the few people who understand it. Therefore, by this measure inventions or advances which improve the common lifestyle are more well received.
In conclusion, great ideas tend to arise from the passionate research and study of the common things, since they affect more number of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...n curbed by the polio vaccine. In those days polio was commomplace and an accepted f...
^^^^
Line 9, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her horse or mule driven, the Ford model gave the people an alternative. Horse-dr...
^^
Line 13, column 188, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'major progress'.
Suggestion: major progress
...n is one such example. It is undeniably a major progress in theoretical physics, which has conti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 114, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... study of the common things, since they affect more number of people.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08219178082 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82101993962 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552511415525 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9350680414 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.181818182 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109439955114 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314321817687 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280192244835 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065863611317 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355775374865 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.