Judgement is one of the arduous task ever. Before judging anyone's hard-work critically one should have depth knowledge in related subject matter. However, we can get many such foolish fellow who try to be pundit in every subject matter and do acerbic criticism on other's hard-work. I would like to suggest to all hard-workers that please do damn care to critical judgment of little knowledge people, pay attention to only them who are expert in related subject matter.
The first reason of my belief is that little knowledge is very dangerous. The little knowledge people have common problem that they cannot judge anythings from both pro and con side. They only can do is negative comments. They think that there are no more things are correct than they knows. The expert people are the one who already have spent much time and effort to understand the many aspect of related works. They can judge every aspect of the work by mentioning strongest and weakest point.
The second reason of my belief is that critical judgment of an expert can show the path of improvement whereas the the little knowledge people's judgement demoralize the worker. For example, last year I had done one research work on support system of underground structure. I had tried a lot to accomplish that work finely. At the end of the day, when my final presentation of my research work was going one electrical engineer did so many unnecessary comment on my research work. Even I tried my best to convinced to him, he did not listen at all. At same day, my main research committee member, who is an expert in related topics, do praise at my works. He also did some comment as suggestion to improve the quality of my research work. I had accepted his comment and had applied his comment on my research document. Finally that research work is recently published in renown journal.
Perhaps the best reason is that critical judgement of an expert helps to create new innovative idea, concept and creation. For instance, two years ago, when I worked as tunnel engineer, I got serious problem in expanding tunnel. I requested my management to hire some expert as consultant. The expert team came and judge my design. They found one flaws and we discussed a lot to correct that flaws. Finally they suggest me to change slight the design to avoid problematic zone. I did according to their suggestion and the problem was solved. I am implementing this idea still to solve many such kind of problems.
By making long story short, the critical judgement of an expert will help hard-worker to increase the quality of his work, to learn new innovative idea and to expand his knowledge. So, the critical judgement of an expert is valuable for us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gement is one of the arduous task ever. Before judging anyones hard-work critically on...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'know'
Suggestion: know
...re no more things are correct than they knows. The expert people are the one who alre...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun aspect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many aspects'.
Suggestion: many aspects
... much time and effort to understand the many aspect of related works. They can judge every ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...an show the path of improvement whereas the the little knowledge peoples judgement demo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...an show the path of improvement whereas the the little knowledge peoples judgement demo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ed his comment on my research document. Finally that research work is recently publishe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
... judgement of an expert helps to create new innovative idea, concept and creation. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... discussed a lot to correct that flaws. Finally they suggest me to change slight the de...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'accord'
Suggestion: accord
...design to avoid problematic zone. I did according to their suggestion and the problem was...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...rease the quality of his work, to learn new innovative idea and to expand his knowledge. So, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55090677919 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504255319149 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9937787107 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7931034483 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2068965517 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20689655172 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195770436853 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552900827166 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522331990241 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1243565593 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434276372999 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.