Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To become an expert in a certain field, one has to have extensive knowledge and have multiple experiences in working and conducting projects in that field. Based on such experiences and knowledge, he/she would be able to give efficient and germane advices for those who are lacking and are inept. I believe that these experts should be the ones to have the opportunity to give critical judgments and are perceived valueless.
First of all, some people might be confound why can't critical judgments given from those who are not an expert in that field should be valued trivial. Of course if the judgments are not criticizing about problems that require erudite knowledge about a certain area such as questioning the moral or ethical standards, then even laypersons would be able provide advice. However, if the problem that needs critical view requires certain degree of knowledge and skills, then critical judgments coming from experts should only be valued. For example, if an IT company was developing an online shopping application and acknowledged problems when investigating the customers' habits in purchasing retail items, then they should receive advice from someone who is an expert in retail and fashion. If someone who is rather a layperson gives advice, their information may be outmoded and may even be irrelevant to fashion which is unhelpful in solving the problem the company is facing.
Moreover, the most crucial reason why only experts' critical judgments should be respected is because they have multiple experiences and are erudite in their field. They would have faced many problems in the past that those who need advice may be facing right now. Advices coming from experts would be much more apposite to the problem and would show more potency in resolving the problem. For example, when a company is suffering with applying a efficient deep learning model in order to develop an artificially intelligent robot, an expert in computer robotics would be a germane choice. The expert would have immense experiences in developing deep learning models and would have experienced problems that can occur while developing such models. Because the expert had faced such problems, there would be a higher chance for him/her to have experienced what the company is facing right now and would be able to figure out the exact problem and the solution for it. Then, the company won't have to spend more effort in solving the problem and could easily move on to the step in developing the robot.
To sum up, experts are erudite and have extensive experiences in their fields, and would be able to provide the apropos solution for the problems those who seek for advice are facing. It would be much more efficient and have less possibility that unexpected consequences would occur, which is why I believe that critical judgments provided from experts should be regarded as the only valuable advices.
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su66
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol60
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe73
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 68
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: CANT
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... all, some people might be confound why cant critical judgments given from those who...
Line 2, column 549, Rule ID: DT_PRP
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
... should only be valued. For example, if an IT company was developing an online shoppi...
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
...d only be valued. For example, if an IT company was developing an online shopping appli...
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
...roblems in the past that those who need advice may be facing right now. Advices coming...
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...en a company is suffering with applying a efficient deep learning model in order ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, as to, for example, of course, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2430.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07306889353 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58841334223 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434237995825 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9536929189 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.941176471 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1764705882 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180567167263 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776485854953 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515393715849 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134980626258 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399987579697 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.