Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the fastly changing world it is easier for people to access information and provide critic over problems which they had no or little expertise of. However, critical judgement of work in any given field has little value if it is not given by an expert.
Firstly, amateur critics may deliver false feedbacks, which causes problems in the future because it effects the work and the end result negatively. Even though everyone can have an opinion on the topic discussed, it does not necessarily mean that the opinion given is holding some truth in it. When the given feedback is false or missing some key information, it may lead to improper development of project or work. A study has been conducted in Yale University among university students, investigating whether students who got feedback on their essays from their peers are more successfull or not. The results highlighted that if the students got no feedback from their peers and only listened to their professors they got higher marks on their projects.
Moreover, non-experts cause poor time management, because they take too much time figuring out the issue. An expert knows how to analyze the topic and evaluate the results accordingly. However, an amateur loses time and spends excessive effort trying to find the problem. In a questionnaire conducted among the firms, it has been shown that if the leaders do not employ experts in their fields, projects have lower return of investment and lower added value due to the poor management skills resulting in increased wages and lower project completion rates.
Although, in contrast to the statement, it is true that in certain non-experts in distict fields are capable of giving true advice by having a wider perspective, it is not always attainable. In the field of creative advertisement and digital marketing non-experts are frequently employed for their broader perspective and ability to think outside of boxes. However most digital marketing firms simultaneously need to employ experts as their managers to correct possible mistakes and lead the project cost and time efficient. Thus, it can be derived from this standpoint that amateur's critics are only valuable if they are also evaluated by seasoned experts in their fields.
Conclusively, even though in some fields critical judgement of non experts may seem necessary, it has been shown that experts add value to work in many ways amateurs cannot. Their expertise enables them to think more clearly, solve problems time and effort efficient and thus cause them to be favorable compared to others.
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi79
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: NOW
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
...ide critic over problems which they had no or little expertise of. However, critic...
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
... and ability to think outside of boxes. However most digital marketing firms simultaneo...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in contrast, in contrast to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15274463007 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71544092658 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534606205251 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9916496107 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6470588235 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182883760813 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672324555793 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767948681363 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118793247184 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737843632491 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.