Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

Essay topics:

Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.

The statement consist of two claims. First the statement claims that learning will be more effective from person having similar views with us. Second, there is very hard to learn from person who shares different idea with us. I strongly agree with both of the statement. Learning will be effective from the person who shares common ideas with us because, it helps to make communication better, give incentive, and reduce stress
There will be good a communication, if we have got chance to learn from the person having similar interest. For example, the lab technician will learn from the person whose views are positive with chemical. If somebody thinks that thhe chemicals are invented just for the destruction, then in this case, the lab technican will not learn effectively from such unbeknonist types of the person. Similarly, the public orator likely to learn little from the reclusive type person about how to improve a public speech.
Learning means improving behavior in positive the way. Similarly, In school if our goal and objectives are to achieve something positive. The Teachers motivation guides us to achieve such acheviments as both of us have the same goal. So teaching process will be more effective. But, at the same time, obdurate students will likely to learn few.
Finally, Learning from person having different opinion leads to negative results-sometimes war also. Civil war in the past of Nepal is one of the example of it. The consequences of political debate leads to war in severe condition. So, the results of discussion with the people having different opinion is not good.
Some people might say , learning from discussion is better, thinking that : it will gestate some new ideas. However, in TV interview, we see, the political discussion leads to nothing results, just waste of time and money. In conclusion, learning will be effective from the person having similar feeling, which ultimately gives the positive results.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on having similar views with us. Second, there is very hard to learn from person ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter, give incentive, and reduce stress There will be good a communication, if w...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about how to improve a public speech. Learning means improving behavior in pos...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate students will likely to learn few. Finally, Learning from person having dif...
^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...leads to negative results-sometimes war also. Civil war in the past of Nepal is one ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion is not good. Some people might say , learning from discussion is better, thi...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'in conclusion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24861878453 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.138121546961 0.157235817809 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0994475138122 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580110497238 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0331491712707 0.0444667217837 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124309392265 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0359116022099 0.0406280797675 88% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6894822725 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0303867403315 0.030933414821 98% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.085635359116 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0276243093923 0.0249443105267 111% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0138121546961 0.0148568991511 93% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1967.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 321.0 452.878318584 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1277258567 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380062305296 0.366273622748 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271028037383 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208722741433 0.200843997647 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.127725856698 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6894822725 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535825545171 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 56.2215826917 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.05 23.380412469 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9018304109 59.4972553346 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.35 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.05 23.380412469 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.674092028746 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 43.1528037383 51.4728631049 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.78313253012 1.64882698954 108% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0530791266678 0.391690518653 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.117328325889 0.123202303941 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.084141812689 0.077325440228 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528770287273 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121441223047 0.149214159877 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227695158445 0.161403998019 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292707674851 0.0892212321368 33% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.330948957149 0.385218514788 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0564254882397 0.0692045440612 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421054567226 0.275328986314 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295465154215 0.0653680567796 45% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.