Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning
What contrast can provide for humans is opening new channels of viewing the word through a different lens. Some persons may approve this notion that just harmony can thrive the competencies of persons and contrast may ebb the one’s opportunities of flourishing. Nonetheless, the other argument affirms that it is totally conspicuous that contrast contributes the persons to unearth other aspects of their lives and flairs. Based on this explanation, the opinion of latter group in endorsing the contrast rather than the uniformity can be vigorously vindicated. (87)
Firstly, the people who believe that learning just can be actualized by the means of expending time with persons who share the same interest. In contrast, how do these kinds of persons expose you to savor the invaluable experience of other dimensions of life in which those cannot observe them? Or, if one dedicates all time and energy with those persons, he will have a prosaic life and after a period of time he may despair and feel despondent. Thus, it is a common tenet that the uniformity and harmony can facilitate the life-style of one to some extent, but if one goes beyond the boundaries of harmony, he will deal with a plethora of dull life. (117)
Afterward, in the case of the latter group, the subsistence of discordancy in the individuals surrounding the humans can encompass a myriad of privileges. Take elevating your knowledge as an example. To delineate, broadening one’s information around sundry issues, the person may be grow as a real person. As a matter of the fact, being an adventurous persons is far better than being an uninteresting person. In addition, rarely does one admit something without contemplating and rummaging about it when he will be enlightened with the help of augmenting his knowledge thanks to contrast.. Indeed, here the significance of disagreement in ideas to trespass the constraints to elevate one‘s thoughts. (110)
Admittedly, the other benefit of contrast can be defined as persuading one to revise his opinion about what he strongly endorses. To illuminate, only when persons have a chance to compare both similarities and differences about one specific case and investigate the pitfalls and positives about that special case, will he foster as a real person; accordingly, he will comprehend the drawbacks and blemish in his notions and makes his strengths to ameliorate them. Therefore, it is critically substantial to propel persons to consider the contradiction to opt for putting his way on an accurate path and finally reach a desired end. Consequently, who could deny the necessity of contrast in humans’ lives to rococo and boost their level of lives. (121)
To recapitulate the enumerated reasons, in spite of existing some benefits in harmony, but the benefits of becoming engross in nonconformity are too enormous to fathom. To sum it up, not only do humans can be gravitated toward thriving, but also they may be predisposed to revise their previous belief about specific something, ultimately, they may be reinforced to rectify them to reach a pinnacle of success in their lives. (70)
(505 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...he will have a prosaic life and after a period of time he may despair and feel despondent. Thu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'person'?
Suggestion: person
...atter of the fact, being an adventurous persons is far better than being an uninteresti...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 594, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...menting his knowledge thanks to contrast.. Indeed, here the significance of disagr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2636.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1484375 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00796215131 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5390625 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7696423949 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.523809524 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.380952381 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734804347137 0.243740707755 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243741404082 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306407263132 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431647917639 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018764601227 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.