The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events
and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people
whose identities have long been forgotten.
The significance of individuals in altering the history is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellations of perspectives, some may regard the public prior than the eminent persons in engendering one foment, in contrast, others persevere in unravelling the notion that the role of luminous persons outweighs the ordinary individuals. After weighing both aspects, the latter group‘s ideas seems more tenable.
To inaugurate, first consider the persons hold on the idea that the efficiency of the public in creating one anarchy in one society takes precedence over than the repute ones. To put in general words, to invigorate one protest, the collaboration of general persons rather than the leaders is of equal importance if not more. However, having initiated one foment, the ordinary persons can continue it and reinforce it. Thus, here the role of leaders and eminent to galvanize and guide the general public in true and actual path is important. In fact, without any the prime person broadening others’ horizon about the phenomena and issues occurring around the general people, expecting such remonstration cannot be plausible.
Converge on the latter opinion, the predominance of presence of a knowledgeable person or connoisseurs who owns a plethora of experiences and information to whet the ordinary persons can be scrutinized aptly. To delineate, only when one is aware about both subjects and objects happening adjacent near him, can it be anticipated that one reasonable and successful even lodges in history. Simply stated, the persons writing the history have just indicated the name of leaders not all their proponents as emblems in history. Based on this explanation, who could deny the necessity of expert and omniscient one in actualize the desires and aspirations of ordinary persons. The existence of general public with lack of stringent leaders cannot leave any positive or palatable repercussions.
Another angle demystifying the latter hypothesis is the reputation and omnipotent of one among the general public. Needless to say, the more the one is recognized as a proper and sagacious human, the more the predilection of general public to obey his orders. Consequently, if one crucial even in history has been occurred, both the general public and famous few will surely be hand in hand. As a matter of the fact, nor does it achieve with eradicating one of them because they, both, play as two wings of one bird which requires both of them to fly in sky. Hence, rarely can the person who influences on the public profoundly be regarded. Furthermore, there is a high susceptibility of conveying what the ordinary ones obtain during the actualizing the vital phenomenon in history to their off springs. It is all transparent that currently we will observe and investigate their achievements.
Drawing upon the enumerated reasons, in spite of subsisting some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, the benefits of presence of famous ones in lodging the substantial events both triumphs and debacles in history are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate the reasons, not only will the individuals are propelled toward a myriad of prosperities, but also they may be predisposed to impart their accomplishments originated from the invaluable treasure of experiences of their leaders to the following generations and off springs.
(536 words)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... and eminent to galvanize and guide the general public in true and actual path is important. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s of ordinary persons. The existence of general public with lack of stringent leaders cannot l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...utation and omnipotent of one among the general public. Needless to say, the more the one is r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ous human, the more the predilection of general public to obey his orders. Consequently, if on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... in history has been occurred, both the general public and famous few will surely be hand in h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, in contrast, in fact, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2866.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3172541744 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04514470289 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528756957328 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 930.6 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1864604206 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.272727273 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0702161080021 0.243740707755 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242374128671 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409055256654 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046451794307 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024545540714 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.