Is it better to spend the money of rich persons for health care?
The significance of decicating monetary to those who are in urgent needs, and deal with the financial predicament is not stealthy for anyone. In spite of subsisting a devirsified constellation of perspectives about how to fulfill this goal, my penchent is more partial to prioritize the medical care than other options. Thanks to ameliorate the status of medical centers in one society, it is aniticipated that other developement can be sustained as well. Three postulations can be proposed to demystify this hypothesis.
To converge on this notion, boosting the standard of lifestyle can be investigated cogently. Going into the depth, having had the environment encompassing a high-quality life standard, the persons may surly thrive and access to pinnacle of successes in the near future. Since, reaching a standard of life is the first obsession for any communities, the governments should make all their strengths to amplify it among the residents to some extent. Based on one scientific research in a psychology province, the more people meet their life-standard owing to the medical care as one of determining factors, the better they can concentrate on other aspects of their life such as protecting the environmnet.
Another angle endorsing this thesis is mitigating the mortality rate. To delineate, in some socities, the vast majority of general public demise just beacuse of fathal diseases, or become paralyzed only due to some infections which all can be halted by the means of providing the better medical centers. Only when the infant moratality rate ebbs, does one colony expect to raise the happy and healthy children who can make the future of that society. Thus, it seems critically substantial for the opulent persons to allocate their assets among the individuals who immidately require their assistances to earadicate the roots of lethal and debilitating diseases in around the world.
To elucidate this theory, the latter outlook is smothering the distribution of contageous diseases to another contries. In general words, when there subsists extraordinary of one contageous ill in one realm, there is the high susceptibility of transmiting it to adjacent contries as well. For instance, through traveling or shiping the commodities, there may be possible to convey the disease to other spots and invlove other areas as well. Face with this fact, rarely can the proliferation of diseases be suppressed without progressed and moderned sanitary and healthcare centers in which recognize the origin of the disease, and then attack and annihilate it perpetaully. Therefore, here the significance of taking the healthcare precedence can be sensed totally.
Drawing upon the reasons, the benefits of contributing the society to surmount the suffers from lack of sufficient healthcares by devoting money for this section are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate the reasons, not only will the citizens prevent from spreading the contagious diseases and reduce the degree of become ill , but also, they may be predisposed to high standard lifestyle to have a chance to live in a better and convineint ambiance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... endorsing this thesis is mitigating the mortality rate. To delineate, in some so...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... in some socities, the vast majority of general public demise just beacuse of fathal diseases,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disease, and then attack and annihilate it perpetaully. Therefore, here the sign...
^^
Line 9, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ases and reduce the degree of become ill , but also, they may be predisposed to hi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in general, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2647.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35829959514 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04340199187 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556680161943 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0683908046 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.315789474 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10408619908 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272466517585 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287901695058 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580871667065 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236412106866 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 86.8835125448 188% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.