There are many controversial issues in our society. Some people think discussing sensible topics with those with opposing views is not helpful because talking with them does not influence their opinion. However, this essay does not agree with those statement with some reasons and examples.
Admittedly, it seems obsolete to talk with someone who has different opinion for some controversial issues because we can not influence them and also we just experience some dislike feelings. For example, there are numerous issues that could not be compromised with others who have opposing opinions. In the case of political choice, it is not easy for progressivists to discuss an economic policy with conservative people. For the problem related to religion, it is also difficult to talk and make a conclusive influence to each other. Like this, in certain circumstances, we are unwilling to discuss controversial topics with those with contrasting views.
However, we cannot ignore the other purpose of discussion. Discussion is useful to not only change other people's thought but also can influence discussants minds and perspective. Even if talking to those with contrasting views do not transform each other's original thought, it is helpful to each other by broadening our perspectives. Let's guess we need to make a decision about abortion or capital punishment. You could could also decide your policy by yourself, but hearing from the opposition side will help you to understand the negative impacts of your opinion and it will make your opinion more strong and comprehensive. Thus, sometimes it is better to discuss and debate with others who have polemical opinions for making a better decision.
Moreover, no one can fully know about the conclusion of the conversation thus it is absorb to assume that someone with contrasting view does not change their minds. Although they looks stubborn and robust, it is too hasty to decide not to talk with them. Someone with a contrasting opinion also belongs to other society and is members of our society so he or she also has an authority to express their opinion freely. If we do not allow people to debate about their sensible opinion, our nation would not be a democratic society. For making our society more healthy, we need to hear and reflect opposing opinions too.
Consequently, just evading to talk with other people who have contrasting opinion is not a best choice in certain cases. There are also merits to discuss with them. Thus, we need to make a wise decision by listening to and embracing opposing opinions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this statement' or 'those statements'?
Suggestion: this statement; those statements
...However, this essay does not agree with those statement with some reasons and examples. Admitt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...h other by broadening our perspectives. Lets guess we need to make a decision about ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: could
...out abortion or capital punishment. You could could also decide your policy by yourself, bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'absorbed'.
Suggestion: absorbed
...nclusion of the conversation thus it is absorb to assume that someone with contrasting...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'look'
Suggestion: look
...s not change their minds. Although they looks stubborn and robust, it is too hasty to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ple who have contrasting opinion is not a best choice in certain cases. There are...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09952606635 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76113028212 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46682464455 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9328709145 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8181818182 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.40909090909 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28450334849 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954821490604 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815166033931 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184694885098 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579709946771 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.