In democratic society, it is easy to see almost every system restricts their leader’s term for preclusion of having excessive power. The author asserts that in any field those is power should be required step down after five years to revitalization through leadership which is the best way to success for their groups. However, it might hold true to some degree, it might not be the best choice in every circumstance. In this essay, I largely disagree with the claims with below reasons and examples.
Admittedly, considering some aspects of power, it would be better to replace old leadership with new one to revitalize the group that need to be success for their own purpose. If the leader take their office for what they want to be, the leader could get stagnant and could fall into the trap of mannerism. In the worst cases, the leader who does not have to be replaced may get corrupted by abusing and privatizing of power as history have shown. However, newly appointed leaders could breathe new perspective into the staleness of economy, politics or enterprises. Moreover, they could come up with new solution of their current problems and could inspire their members to cope with their obstacle. Like this, newly appointed have several advantages than long-tern leadership, thus the claim that in some field those in the office should be substituted after five years.
However, it seems inevitable that periodical substitutions of leadership in five-year cycle may get the result in the way that is not as we expect. The value of experience that a long-standing term of leadership provide should not be underestimated. The long-term leadership also revitalize their class, enterprise and even nation. For example, Franklin Roosevelt is the best example to illustrate the merits of long-tern leadership. He not only handled with harsh economic crisis but also leaded United Nations to win successively in the Second World War. If he did not have 12-year term, it would have been impossible to operate his newly idea of recovering the society from economic crisis by New Deal project.
Furthermore, the advantage of long-term leadership may be effective in the field of education as well as political area. A psychologist with many years of firsthand counseling experience is more likely to offer practical help than one who knows only the theories of psychology. The experienced educators who communicated with his or her students for numerous years could be easy to figure out what student needs and to know what the best practice to their students. New teachers may be easy to make students be attentive their classes, there may be a lot of other factors which consist of good quality of lecture such as communication methods, lecture methods or lecture materials. Thus, we can not accept the assertion that in “every field” leadership should be replaced in every five years.
Consequently, the author’s claim may be effective in certain circumstances, however, I can not largely agree with this claim because there are apparent advantages of long-term leadership. Thus, when we have to set the rule of leadership’s term, advantages and shortcoming of both long-term and short-term leadership is essential.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2703.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 526.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13878326996 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88201703785 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507604562738 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3337851144 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.52173913 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8695652174 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.60869565217 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157471164653 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053367642059 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065156079356 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993019968797 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682929132118 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.