Some believe that local communities should rely on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities (e.g., organizing youth sports leagues and collecting donations for charity). Others believe that local communities are better served when professional community leaders with the necessary skills and time instead handle such projects.
In our contemporary society based on democratic principles, some claim that local communities have to depend on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities while others believe that local communities are better served when leaders with necessary skills and time instead handle such projects. This following essay will largely agree with the later opinion with below reasons and examples.
Admittedly, relying on volunteers citizen may be a good idea in certain circumstances. If a city offers an opportunity for people, it would motivate citizens and provide the chance to utilize their potentials for the broad goals. It will also bring diverse ideas for making the community better and safer, or prosper than before and will give a sense of satisfaction to citizens who are involving those projects as a citizen who lived in a democratic nation. For example, In South Korea, there have been several projects which are initiated by volunteers such as field trips that have historical themes. Many people have participated in those projects by planning courses of trips and funding for projects and it has brought a lot of people who want to be amateur guides and visitors.
However, there are some negative aspects of just depending on citizen volunteers for projects in a city. Because citizen volunteers who are consist of various jobs and have diverse interests might not have special skills and necessary knowledge for developing plans for the city. Since lacking of knowledge and experience, they would make more mistakes and errors than experts would. Furthermore, citizen volunteers may not have enough financial ability to proceed with all of the communities' projects. Unless securing funding for projects which they planned, it could not be actualized because of lack of money. Additionally, citizen "volunteers" may not be last enough for finishing every project which they started. All of them have their jobs and hobbies, so it will be difficult to devote all of their mind and time to finish those project which may be important to someones who are closely related to that project.
Thus, it seems more plausible to give a role for making and proceeding a project to professional community leaders who already had adequate skills, experience, and knowledge. Educated leaders could find out the way of effective and efficient use of limited resources allocated to a specific project. They could do not repeat mistakes like volunteers and save the time for success in the project. Let's consider the situation: for restoring the city, all citizens try to give advice. It would bring confusion and chaos because a lot of ideas which may not be relevant to the cities because of their lack of specific knowledge of the city.
Consequently, the argument that local communities have to depend on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities seems impractical to adapt to all cities. To make a more balanced approach to develop successful projects, it is better to take consider the role of experts who are equipped with essential knowledge and experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'volunteers'' or 'volunteer's'?
Suggestion: volunteers'; volunteer's
...and examples. Admittedly, relying on volunteers citizen may be a good idea in certain c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...a sense of satisfaction to citizens who are involving those projects as a citizen who lived i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s in a city. Because citizen volunteers who are consist of various jobs and have divers...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...ity. Because citizen volunteers who are consist of various jobs and have diverse intere...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nough financial ability to proceed with all of the communities projects. Unless securing f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ve the time for success in the project. Lets consider the situation: for restoring t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, as for, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2621.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26305220884 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85683980736 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471887550201 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3754935402 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.80952381 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339605232402 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110026351983 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113299992358 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232151159944 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853609885849 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.