A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Setting a education policy is fundamental for nation to achieve its lasting and stable progress and influences so many people including parents, teachers and the most, students. Thus, there are controversies whether a nation applies formal education curriculum in all schools or not. The author asserts that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, however, it may not be the best choice if we take into account various circumstances of students and development of technology.
Admittedly, the formal education with national curriculum has a lot of advantages due to its standardization of teaching and effectiveness. For making a national curriculum, it might need several experts and teachers who knows what they have to teach and what essential materials are for each grades of students. Thus, students taught by formal education would be easy to follow what they learned and what they will learn. Furthermore, with formal education, it is possible to train professional teachers who are equipped with specialized knowledge and educating skills. It may lead all students of a nation to prepare for advanced knowledge effectively.
Nonetheless, there are several shortages of education with the same curriculum. First of all, it is hard to focus on individual students who have different abilities and variant potentials regarding on their own interest. If a student who wants to be a famous artist of painting with his or her intuitive expression of subject takes the same education with a student who is indulge into scientific theories such as quantum theory of Hawking, it would lead both of them to be less motivated and even worse it would make them discouraged to achieve their goals.
On the other hands, informal education with no equal curriculum has numerous merits for students who want to develop their own talents. Since in today's society communicative technology have developed so much, it is possible to learn almost everything in almost everywhere and it also make students find what they want to learned by whom they want to be taught by TED, Youtube or other sites for education.
Therefore, if the advantage of the informal education and disadvantage of the formal education with the same national curriculum, it seems more sage to take a more careful stance to adapt to the same national curriculum.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Setting a education policy is fundamental for nat...
^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'indulged'.
Suggestion: indulged
...he same education with a student who is indulge into scientific theories such as quantu...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...ything in almost everywhere and it also make students find what they want to learned...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18604651163 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92870319066 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50645994832 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4416330795 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.357142857 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362731059756 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139973287185 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12859645015 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219567932781 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149191214339 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.