The author of the president of Seatown University asserts that they should institute a free-tuition policy for the purpose of enhancing morale among faculty and luring new professors by following the example of Oceania University. It seems interesting, however, the author largely relies on assumptions which cannot be taken for granted thus this following essay will point out other evidence needed to make strengthen or weaken the argument.
Firstly, the author assumes that Seatown University and nearby Oceania University are suitable to compare each other. The author thinks that if the free-tuition had benefits in Oceania University thus it would make similar result at Seatown University. However, it may not be the case. If the former university is special university like religious institution, the impact of the free-tuition policy could not make the same impact to other general university. Additionally, if Oceania University is specially built to teach and professors do not receive any tuition by teaching, the faculty would escape the university for their decent life. If author give evidence about the sameness of two university, we should listen the author's argument. Otherwise, it is hard to adapt Oceania's specific and unique policy to Seatown University.
Secondly, the author surmises that free-tuition policy could be a best choice for the purpose of enhancing morale and attract new professors, however, it might not be true. Because there is no enough evidence to prove the impact of free-tuition policy related to those two purpose, the author could not conclude. We cannot sure whether there is negative impact of the policy or not and even do not know about the motivation and purpose of adapting the policy. The author should provide enough information about the result and effect of free-tuition in Oceania University.
Lastly, the author seems to omit other factors contributing to those two purposes. For example, sufficient salary and super-class service to professor would be result in enhancing morale and attracting more professors. Giving more funds to the faculty and attracting more eminent students may be the better options for the Seatown University. Thus, the author should think about other factors relating to two purpose and make a decision on the base of profound analysis.
In sum, the author wants to adapt the policy like Oceania University, however, there is no sufficient evidence to prove the argument. Therefore, the author should present more evidence pertaining to the comparability of two university, impact of free-tuition policy, and other possible policies.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...of two university, we should listen the authors argument. Otherwise, it is hard to adap...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...mises that free-tuition policy could be a best choice for the purpose of enhancin...
^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of free-tuition in Oceania University. Lastly, the author seems to omit other f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 2260.96107784 98% => OK
No of words: 409.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41075794621 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83766507246 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435207823961 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8932251242 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.473684211 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233918643559 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871288488838 0.0743258471296 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966655126038 0.0701772020484 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140345583056 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107688518613 0.0628817314937 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 726, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...of two university, we should listen the authors argument. Otherwise, it is hard to adap...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...mises that free-tuition policy could be a best choice for the purpose of enhancin...
^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of free-tuition in Oceania University. Lastly, the author seems to omit other f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 2260.96107784 98% => OK
No of words: 409.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41075794621 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83766507246 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435207823961 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8932251242 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.473684211 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233918643559 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871288488838 0.0743258471296 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966655126038 0.0701772020484 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140345583056 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107688518613 0.0628817314937 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.3550499002 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.