It is controversial to conclude whether government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve or officials should pass a judgment based on their own decision. The following essay will seek to find the advantages and a limitation of each contention for some reasons and agree with the later one.
Admittedly, In some circumstances, it would be better for government officials to follow the will of the people whom they serve since we live in a democratic society. In the democratic regime, people have a right to elect their representatives, and elected representatives should serve people and follow the will of the people for the sake of people. As all know, ordinary people have a common sense and general experience to decide properly in most situations. It is well illustrated in the examples such as the antiwar movements and other kinds of civil movements.
However, it might not be the case in certain circumstances. In specific cases, government officials who are picked up through a competitive procedure can decide which policies are better for the nation and people. As we do not let our lives depend on a novice doctor, people do not want their decision related to their lives to be determined by just normal people. For example, policies of diplomacy and economy can entail a prolonged impact on society. These kinds of things should be considered including all aspects of society. Thus, it may be better to be determined by government officials who are knowledgeable in the field.
Furthermore, government officials can set the direction of the society to the betterment of human beings. However, ordinary citizens are easy to make a policy related to their imminent situation such as poverty, unemployment, or improvement of their living standard. But, it is necessary to pursue a policy that is not emergent but also important to human beings. For example, the issue of global warming is a huge problem for all nations. In most countries, people do not pay enough attention to greenhouse gases emission than to the cheap price of a product. Thus, government officials should pass a valid decision that considers the effect of the present as well as the future.
Consequently, if government officials just follow the will of the people they serve, it could result in myopic decisions in some situations. In some cases, well-trained and experienced officials might be a better person to have a responsibility to decide an important policy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0488997555 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98883330132 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479217603912 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3585506097 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.25 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328930488466 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915252584756 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119018234084 0.0758088955206 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201128381265 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102402907418 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.